Search for: "Does 1-27" Results 4621 - 4640 of 11,127
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2006, 4:37 am
" ("Geldof and Bono take G8 campaign to Germany," Dec. 27). [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 11:26 am
To learn more about how you can protect your rights at a free consultation, please contact us through the Internet or call toll-free at 1-877-990-4990. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 2:00 am by Marilyn Moran, FordHarrison
Likewise, 31% of office workers prefer a business-casual dress code, while 27% prefer a casual dress code or no dress code at all. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 9:40 am by Colby Pastre
This relationship is important, although it does not always hold true. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 7:30 pm by A. Brian Albritton
., 2012 WL 1372219 (C.A.D.C.) and reversed the District Court, holding (1) that the Government does not have an unfettered right to dismiss a relator's qui tam where there is a settlement pending between the Government and the Defendant as the settlement requires the Court's approval to be finalized if a relator objects; (2) if the relator objects, the Government cannot settle a qui tam with a Defendant unless the Court first… [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 8:42 am by William McGrath
In an October 27, 2011 Order (discussed here), Judge Rakoff scheduling a hearing for November 9, 2011 to "ascertain whether the proposed judgment is fair, reasonable, adequate, and in the public interest. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 9:18 am by Phillips & Associates
The NYCHRL section specifically dealing with employment discrimination, id. at 8-107(1), does not mention reasonable accommodations, but the section defining the term mentions “claims filed under subdivision[] one…of section 8-107. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 9:56 am by Katharina Schmid (schmid-ip)
It is sufficient if a ground for invalidity exists in relation to a not insignificant part of the relevant public (para 62, referring to GC judgment T-878/16 – KARELIA, EU:T:2017:702, para 27). [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 11:30 am
District Board, Shahjahanapur, [1952] 1 SCR 122) that is quite similar to Inco, the Supreme Court followed Lord Simonds' approach. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 2:10 am by Kelly
Tabari (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) Precedential No. 27: Finding computer software and services related, TTAB affirms 2(d) ACTIVECARE refusal (TTABlog) [read post]