Search for: "Does 1-27" Results 4641 - 4660 of 12,440
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jul 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The decisive factor here is when the person concerned ought to have noticed the error if he had taken all due care.The representative has conceded that he received the notification of the loss of rights pursuant to R 112(1) on 10 December 2008 […].Receipt of notification under R 112(1) is relevant to the question of when the cause of non-compliance with a time limit is removed. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 4:33 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
Under this program the SBA pays (1) the principal and interest of new (7)(a) loans issued prior to September 27, 2020 and (2) the principal and interest of current (7)(a) small business loans for a period of six months under this program. [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 9:31 am by Elie Maalouf
27 Likewise, the United States District Court for the District of Southern California has held that facts communicated to  a  party  by  his  or  her  counsel are not protected by the attorney-client privilege. [read post]
7 May 2024, 9:32 am by vforberger
The commission finds that the Department does not have the legal authority to charge a penalty on fraudulently obtained LWA benefits. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 10:05 am by Eugene Volokh
The February 27 Policy is not facially discriminatory as it does not explicitly implicate a protected class. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 3:26 am by Diane Tweedlie
The wording of the claims is not relevant for the present decision and is not reproduced here.Reasons for the DecisionPriority right (Article 87(1) EPC)1. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 5:58 pm by Business Law Post
Like Wyoming, Nevada does not at this time charge a corporate income tax, franchise tax, personal income tax, inventory tax or tax on corporate shares. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 8:22 am
That does not however mean that the defence automatically succeeds, as use of the work must also be lawful. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 1:20 pm by MacIsaac
It does not, in my view, diminish the duty to proceed with caution and it does not remove the right of way from another driver who is approaching in his or her proper lane. [27] In any event, the question of whether or not the defendant was in violation of the statutory provision is not determinative. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 4:45 pm by Nate Russell
[…] A roadway does not include the shoulder. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 2:36 am by SHG
” Two questions. (1) This seems badly drafted to me. [read post]
7 Sep 2006, 4:50 pm
We also think that adding the instructions limitation does notrender claim 1 of the ‘611 patent non-obvious. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 1:31 pm
  The ICTY Statute does not give the Trial Chamber that power. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 9:11 am by Amy Howe
But Section 1152(a)(1)(A) does not, Roberts stressed, limit the president’s ability to block the entry of nationals of some countries. [read post]