Search for: "In re Hill"
Results 4641 - 4660
of 6,437
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2022, 12:35 am
There are two commentaries on the 2022 edition: Professor Mark Hill, “Principles of Canon Law and the Mind of the Anglican Communion” 26 July 2022 and Andrew Goddard. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 10:14 am
We would be almost certain to get more qualified VPs, including, among other things, VPs who might in fact know how Capitol Hill operates. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 9:49 pm
§ 1052(c). [3] In re Elster, No. 20-2205, slip op. at 5 (Fed. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 3:05 am
And if you're going to try to spin your way out of this cesspool, be prepared for a harsh response. [read post]
7 Aug 2007, 12:02 pm
Hill v. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 3:30 am
But, plant your flag and defend the hill at your own risk. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 12:25 am
See also Matthew Hill’s post today on this blog. [read post]
9 Jan 2021, 3:29 am
Too inexperienced to be entrusted to try their first case, they’re federal judges instead. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 6:16 am
We’re going to kill more people because you are not doing your job. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 11:34 am
One prosecutor asked: "You're saying that [they're] going on the stand, swearing an oath to testify to the truth and then lying . . . ? [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 5:19 am
I hope they do not back down from this as they “re-evaluate” this rule. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 12:24 pm
If they come back they’re yours; if they don’t, they never were. [read post]
17 Jul 2021, 3:58 am
It’s Mission Capture, where the primary mission becomes secondary (or worse) to dying on the hill of social justice. [read post]
8 May 2012, 12:00 am
"We’re honored to add Washington University to the esteemed family of 2tor partners," says Chip Paucek, co-founder and CEO of 2tor. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 5:50 pm
As the technology has grown closer to commercialization and companies have gotten funding, we're seeing more activity on the Hill and at both FERC and MMS, which was authorized to issue leases for alternative energy projects on the OCS. [read post]
27 May 2009, 4:09 am
We're at the table. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 1:30 pm
Clearly, these internally inconsistent rules need to be re-examined, if not thrown out altogether. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 11:21 am
“For him to him to say basically, ‘If you can’t do my way then we’re not going anything at all,’ I think would be very sad in the process,” said Rep. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 4:38 am
And, from Daniel Griswold at Cato: “A silver lining of the Arizona immigration law is that is has turned up the heat on Washington to re-examine federal policy. . . . [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 2:14 pm
We’re dragging them through the mud. [read post]
