Search for: "Young v. Young"
Results 4641 - 4660
of 11,373
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2025, 3:50 am
The case is Reese v. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 6:16 am
People v. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 6:42 am
Background In Mahanoy Area School District v. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 6:42 am
Background In Mahanoy Area School District v. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 6:42 am
Background In Mahanoy Area School District v. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 12:44 pm
No young girl is going to run away and take her pocketbook but leave her wallet. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 3:41 am
While many children - whether young or ... less young - around the world are keenly awaiting 25 December to unwrap their Christmas presents, for IPKat readers 25 is the number of this week's round-up of all the Kat-items posted last week. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 9:43 am
Young, 253 S.W.3d 790, 805 (Tex. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 9:43 am
Young, 253 S.W.3d 790, 805 (Tex. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:26 pm
Covell, 157 N.J. 554, 564-71 (1999) (applying the analysis to defendant’s statement that he liked “‘young girls’” in a prosecution for luring); State v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 9:18 am
Answers may have to come as lower courts apply the new ruling, issued in J.D.B. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 7:01 pm
They even know less about the Supreme Court’s decision in Roe v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 4:16 am
For example, see Greene v Watts (1962) 210 CA2d 103 (young child may not be capable of assumption of risk or contributory negligence in dog-bite case) or the ruling in People v Berry (1991) 1 CA4th 778 (a child under the age five is not legally capable of acting with reasonable care towards a dog). [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 12:14 am
Lindenbaum & Young QUEENS COUNTYFamily Law Court Grants Petition to Amend Order of Adoption Nunc Pro Tunc as in Best Interests of Subject Child Matter of K. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 5:49 pm
So, Above the Law readers: How would you vote in Commonwealth v. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 6:23 am
Olson v. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 1:01 am
However, if you can take into account their knowledge that something, such as the ox cart in Edward Young v Grierson Oldham, is commonly used descriptively, wouldn’t their knowledge that something was a trade mark be relevant also? [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 12:52 pm
Youngs Drug Prods. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 1:20 am
SEC v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 7:06 pm
Court of Appeals ruled today in Adar v. [read post]
