Search for: "DOES I-X"
Results 4661 - 4680
of 7,402
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2016, 2:31 pm
., 550 U.S.398, 418 (2007) (“[I]t can be important to identify a reasonthat would have prompted a [PHOSITA] to combine theelements in the way the claimed new invention does. [read post]
6 Sep 2015, 4:51 pm
How similar am I to the people it examined? [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 2:56 pm
Rockhill involved review of an arbitration proceeding that property-owner, Heirloom I, LLC (“Heirloom”) filed against CFI-Global Fisheries Management (“CFI”). [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 5:02 pm
Doctors may need to order X-rays, CT scans (computer tomography), and/or MRI scans (magnetic resonance imaging) multiple times to pinpoint the fracture. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 10:32 am
The important thing is that it does not refer to the outcome of the case, such as whether the patent is valid and whether it is infringed by a particular product.Res judicata is about the outcome of a case, and refers to the principle that, once a matter has been decided as between two parties in a decision that is final (ie not open to further appeal), neither party can re-litigate the same matter again. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 2:02 pm
Tom Mitcheson commented that, in the light of this decision, it would probably be necessary to consult your lawyer before answering the question: does what I am doing constitute “making”? [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 12:29 pm
HSLF does not judge candidates based on party affiliation or any other issue. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 8:04 pm
Patent applications disclose a lot of things, so claiming "as disclosed in patent publication X" is almost certainly indefinite. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 2:49 am
While the High Court found that the device was visually prominent in that it appeared at the beginning of the later mark and it was not allusive or descriptive of the word “caesarstone” or the claimed goods, the CA found the device to be an insignificant component of the later mark, because: (a) the device does not constitute a major part of the later mark;(b) the device, being a series of three crescents: (i) is simple and will not evoke any particular concept… [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 1:54 pm
Werner stated that “GhostBed does not have any affiliation whatsoever with co-defendants Honest Reviews LLC or Mr. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 4:12 am
App’x 516 (Fed. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 6:30 am
When the employer or adjuster does not know which doctor they should call on for an IME, they can often consult with the nurse case managers they use or with defense counsel. [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 1:28 am
But it does turn out that “tronc” is a dictionary word, meaning “(in a hotel or restaurant) a common fund into which tips and service charges are paid for distribution to the staff. [read post]
24 May 2017, 10:40 am
The case no is X ZR 120/15. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
In Doe v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 11:00 am
When it comes to trade marks, it does not go as far as "Monster Energy," in the view of the High Court of Singapore. [read post]
14 Aug 2024, 5:39 am
He characterized all of the key language I've just quoted as dicta. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 12:44 am
He had scheduled a patient to have an unnecessary X -ray and recommended that another patient be discharged. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 8:00 pm
Virginia does have private alcohol education classes (listed here, for instance). [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 1:10 am
So, as this is a ‘fast track’ question I asked a few supplemental questions and got the following answers: Q: When does or did your tenants fixed term tenancy end? [read post]
