Search for: "Lowe v. State"
Results 4661 - 4680
of 9,644
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2010, 9:48 pm
(T.W.N.) v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 7:55 pm
Synergy Sport International, Ltd. v United States, 17 C.I.T. 18 (1993). [read post]
4 May 2010, 10:33 am
How low does the State of Florida (through the JAC) expect doctors, psychiatrists, forensic specialists, etc., to charge? [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 7:42 am
McDonald v. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 9:38 pm
In the case of condemned killer Michael Anthony Archuleta, a unanimous court said low pay and the complexity of such cases have shrunk the pool of Utah attorneys who will accept them. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 12:55 pm
Synergy Sport International, Ltd. v United States, 17 C.I.T. 18 (1993).Customs cites many difficulties with the application of the First Sale Rule as the reasons for the proposed change. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 12:39 pm
Though not as robust since Furman, executive clemency has been a critical tool in some states; the "traditional 'fail safe' remedy," as it was called in the 1993 Supreme Court case of Herrera v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 3:05 pm
ABx1 26 passes on the obligations and liabilities for low to moderate income housing programs without clearly identifying funding sources. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 1:52 am
SCOTUSblog reports that "no action was taken on a plea by the state of Louisiana to reconsider the June 25 decision in Kennedy v. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 11:26 am
The report’s findings are especially relevant as the Supreme Court is expected to hand down a decision in Brackeen v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 5:00 pm
Dick v. [read post]
27 May 2024, 2:27 pm
See, Gideon v. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 9:05 pm
In Gonzalez v. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 12:13 pm
Marko v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 5:01 am
See Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2024, 3:02 pm
See Stewart v. [read post]
18 May 2014, 11:01 am
Assistance, 433 Mass. 171, 740 N.E.2d 978, 980 (2001) (referencing espoused purpose of 1986 federal Medicaid amendments, as stated by the founding members of the bill, to stop “`affluent individuals … [from] diverting scarce Federal and State resources from low-income elderly and disabled individuals’” (emphasis added) (citation omitted)); Allen v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 11:59 am
Once the Court granted probable jurisdiction in McCutcheon v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 3:52 am
In Wallis v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 4:03 pm
Bell (07-1114), seeking a ruling that a state prison inmate who has raised constitutional challenges twice before in state courts may not press them anew in a federal habeas case. [read post]
