Search for: "Heard v. State" Results 4681 - 4700 of 17,335
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Gibson) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 5 Dec 2017. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 Vedanta Resources Plc & Anor v Lungowe & Ors, heard 15-16 Jan 2019 Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation & Ors v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, heard 27 June 2019 In the… [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
  Where a state breaches the ECHR, a Court set up by signatory members – the European Court of Human Rights (which has nothing to do with the European Union) – can order a state to pay an aggrieved citizen compensation. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 6:51 am by Ryan Dolby-Stevens, Olswang
The appeal was granted a ‘leapfrog certificate’ by the High Court judge and consequently found its way to the Supreme Court without being heard in the Court of Appeal. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 7:32 am by Jocelyn Hutton
R (SG & Ors) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions,heard 29-30 April. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 5:09 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (SG & Ors) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, heard 29-30 April. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 1:00 am by Jocelyn Hutton
Reference by the Attorney General for Northern Ireland – Abortion Services (Safe Access Zones) (Northern Ireland) Bill, heard 19th July 2022 R (on the application of VIP Communications Ltd (In Liquidation)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 4th October 2022 of DCM (Optical Holdings) v Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 12th October 2022. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 5:12 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Supreme Court of Canada confirmed this in BCE Inc. v. 1976 Debentureholders, where the court stated, “While the corporation is ongoing, shares confer no right to its underlying assets. [read post]