Search for: "In INTEREST OF FEW v. State"
Results 4681 - 4700
of 11,572
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2023, 11:58 am
Corp. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 7:35 am
As a consequence, even going back into the distant past yields few precedents of accounts of profits in trade mark cases. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 2:33 pm
Co. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2009, 6:59 am
In Gantler v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 5:19 pm
Will the challenge to the individual mandate join Worcester v. [read post]
26 May 2013, 10:26 am
Dear Reader, Our Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice, Basil Grayling, continues to provide food for thought for serious commentators and fodder for satirists alike with his ill conceived plan to destroy legal aid and the criminal justice system with it. [read post]
26 May 2013, 10:26 am
Dear Reader, Our Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice, Basil Grayling, continues to provide food for thought for serious commentators and fodder for satirists alike with his ill conceived plan to destroy legal aid and the criminal justice system with it. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 3:59 am
As the Supreme Court has stated, “the circumstances in which a question of law can be extricated from the interpretation process will be rare”: Ledcor Construction Ltd. v. [read post]
24 May 2022, 4:16 pm
If a claimant has lied in their pleadings or evidence, they could face contempt proceedings or a prosecution for perjury – rare, but not unheard of (see R v Jeffrey Archer and R v Jonathan Aitkin). [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 9:15 am
While the English v. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 1:49 pm
In United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 10:06 am
This phrase already occurs 14 times in the Copyright Act, including for example s. 13(7). which states:(7) For greater certainty, it is deemed alwaysto have been the lawthat a grant of an exclusivelicence in a copyright constitutes the grantof an interest in the copyright by licence.R.S., 1985, c. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 3:55 pm
[Day v. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 6:26 pm
It also "disturbs the State's significant interest in repose for concluded litigation, denies society the right to punish some admitted offenders, and intrudes on state sovereignty to a degree matched by few exercises of federal judicial authority. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 11:46 am
The first class sought damages and was limited to customers in six states, with a separate sub-class for each state. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 1:50 pm
The Supreme Court reaffirmed as much, a few years ago, in its (unanimous) ruling in Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 12:14 am
Roskind v Emigh. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 4:29 am
Further, a legal malpractice claim cannot be stated if there is no attorney-client relationship between the parties (Waggoner v Caruso, 68 AD3d 1, 3 [1st Dept 2009], affd 14 NY3d 874 [2010]). [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 8:53 am
Yemshaw v Hounslow LBC [2011] UKSC 3 While my NL colleagues are off partying at a secret location for lunch, I’ve managed to steal a few precious minutes from an appallingly tight deadline (Sinead: if you’re reading this, it’ll be there, honest) to write a paean of praise in honour of Baroness Hale’s judgment in this case. [read post]
