Search for: "Lay v. Lay"
Results 4681 - 4700
of 8,598
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2023, 2:27 pm
From Kidd v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 6:17 am
The Supreme Court’s holding in Univ. of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 6:19 am
Merck Eprova AG v. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 7:32 pm
The Crown’s failure in this case lay more in their characterization of the mandatory injunction sought in their application materials. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 7:00 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 4:21 pm
This opinion deftly cuts through the accumulated doctrinal cruft and lays a nice foundation for future Internet trademark jurisprudence. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 11:12 pm
Saffran v. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 7:15 am
Penn v. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 8:12 am
The Court of Justice has handed down an interesting judgment in Case C-275/06 Promusicae v. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 11:57 am
In macabre detail, the Eighth Circuit issued a March 6, 2018 decision in Bucklew v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 7:21 am
The following response in our symposium on Kiobel v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 4:59 am
Here is the complaint in United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 12:12 pm
Circuit Judges David Tatel, Merrick Garland, and Stephen Williams will hear oral arguments in Al Alwi v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 9:32 am
District Judge Susan Illston ruled yesterday (Wild Equity Institute v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 2:02 am
In Georgian Muslim Relations and Others v Georgia [2023] ECHR 949, the presenting issue was the Government’s alleged failure to take adequate measures to protect the applicants from unlawful mob action, hate speech and other discriminatory actions in the context of their being prevented from opening a Muslim boarding school [1]. [read post]
9 May 2023, 1:40 pm
The star of the show in the Appellate Division decision, Joseph Bernstein v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 4:26 pm
The alleged inventiveness lay in the claim that the product would have a particular property, namely, to prevent or treat restenosis. ... [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 9:42 am
On Tuesday I wrote about an appalling case, Roberts v. [read post]
31 Jul 2024, 12:00 am
They were a statutory corporation established by the Church Commissioners Measure 1947, a number of public officeholders were members ex officiis of the Commissioners, and the Commissioners were required to lay an annual report and accounts before Parliament. [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 3:09 am
In considering this question, Marcus Smith J considered the case law regarding the stay of proceedings and, in particular, the Court of Appeals judgment in IPCom v HTC[2]. [read post]
