Search for: "R. MORALES" Results 4681 - 4700 of 15,256
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2015, 7:35 am
There can be unusual cases where government officials are morally justified in violating the Constitution, including by disobeying judicial rulings. [read post]
31 May 2015, 9:01 pm by Joseph Margulies
This column continues my discussion of police reform. [read post]
31 May 2015, 9:53 am by Guest and Gray Law Firm
State, came up with three elements that can determine child competency (1) the competence to observe intelligently the events in question at the time of their occurrence, (2) the capacity to recollect the events, and (3) the capacity to narrate them, which involves the ability to understand the questions asked and to frame intelligent answers, and the ability to understand the moral responsibility to tell the truth. [read post]
29 May 2015, 5:00 am by Doug Cornelius
[More…] Law School Moral Hazard and Flawed Public Policy by Steven J. [read post]
28 May 2015, 3:24 pm
Slip Op. 12,018 Benita Nicasio MORALES, Respondent, v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 11:08 am by J. Bradley Smith, Esq.
Lewis said it is morally wrong to lie to a putative lover, whether one is lying about being married, lying about one’s profession, about one’s “criminal history, parental history, marital history…” Kathleen Bogle, an assistant professor of sociology and criminal justice at La Salle University in Philadelphia, told Philly.com that law-enforcement authorities actively pursue “sexual predators who try to lure victims into sexual situations through deceit. [read post]
28 May 2015, 8:03 am
The remaining factors are closely connected: there is moral blame that can be attached to defendant's failure to take minimal, inexpensive steps to avert harm to its patrons and persons in the roadway. [read post]
27 May 2015, 11:00 pm by J
Conclusion I’ve never liked the Tory party* and I do have major moral problems with this legislative programme. [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:00 pm
Grabbing a child by the arm and attempting to pull him into a room, while perhaps not a preferred parenting method, is not in and of itself conduct likely to be injurious to the child's physical, mental or moral welfare. [read post]
25 May 2015, 6:37 pm by Steve Shiffrin
When government forces someone to do something they feel morally obligated not to do or forbids someone not to do something they feel obligated to do, a just system would recognize that this burden on freedom of conscience is at least regrettable and often impermissible. [read post]
25 May 2015, 1:53 pm
" The aim of the statute is to protect "the physical health, morals and well-being of children.... [read post]
25 May 2015, 4:15 am
In response, other citizens of la République française seem to have taken legal action claiming "violation of the Constitution and the 1883 Paris Convention". [read post]
24 May 2015, 3:22 pm
Because the factual allegations that the defendant grabbed his three-year-old son by the arm and attempted to pull him into the bathroom are insufficient to establish that the defendant knowingly acted in a manner likely to be injurious to the physical, mental or moral welfare of a child, the defendant's motion is granted. [read post]
23 May 2015, 10:36 am by Clark
My wrong prediction The other day my friend Ken asked me (and the other Popehat contributors) for feedback on his idea of blogging about his depression. [read post]
22 May 2015, 3:30 am by Melissa Murray
Gonzales,  a majority of the Supreme Court characterized abortion as “a difficult and painful moral decision” that may cause women profound psychological, physical, and emotional harm.2 In response to these arguments and the judicial decisions that entrench them as truths, pro-choice advocates have sought to recast abortion in a more positive light. [read post]
21 May 2015, 10:22 am
” … Matsumoto argues this violates his freedom of association, violates his state and federal rights to privacy (the California Constitution expressly secures such a right), constitutes “improper morals legislation” and thus fails the rational basis test, and is unconstitutionally vague. [read post]
20 May 2015, 9:16 pm
Instead, IHL should aim to help combatants better conform to their moral obligations. [read post]
20 May 2015, 1:40 pm
§ 831.02, is a crime that involves deceit and is categorically a crime involving moral turpitude and when coupled with a loss to the victim of $10,000 or more, is an aggravated felony under INA § 101(a)(43)(M)(i). [read post]
19 May 2015, 5:10 pm by Tod M. Leaven
The general Statutory and regulatory bars to VA benefits based on discharge are as follows: discharge as a conscientious objector who refused to perform military duty or refused to wear the uniform or otherwise refused to comply with lawful orders of a competent military authority, discharge or dismissal by reason of a sentence of a general court-martial, an officer resigning for the good of the service, desertion discharge as an alien during a time of hostility, discharge under other than honorable… [read post]
19 May 2015, 2:16 pm by Brian Dalton
Our survey asks current and former summers to rate their employers based on the categories of Compensation, Hours, Firm Morale, Training, and Culture and Colleagues. [read post]