Search for: "United States v. Minor" Results 4681 - 4700 of 7,102
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2018, 8:58 am by Adam Feldman
” The cases This hypothesis is easily testable at the Supreme Court level because all of the relevant data are available, mainly from the United States Supreme Court Database. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 3:32 pm by Zack Bluestone
” For its part, the United States expressed a more restrained sense of optimism, at least officially. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
United Federation of Teachers et al., amici curiae. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am by Graham Smith
Citations in the post are to that list and to paragraph numbers in the Communication.Index to Issues and AnnexPresumed illegalDue process at sourceLegal competence v practical competenceDue process v quality standardsManifest illegality v contextual informationIllegality on the face of the statute v prosecutorial discretionOffline v onlineMore is better, faster is bestLiability shield v removal toolNational laws v coherent EU… [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 5:30 am by Bailey DeSimone
Lingering state sodomy laws were invalidated in the 2003 Lawrence v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 3:50 pm by David Bernstein
" MICHAEL OMI & HOWARD WINANT, RACIAL FORMATION IN THE UNITED STATES 122 (3d ed. 2015); see also PETER H. [read post]
8 Sep 2024, 6:37 pm by centerforartlaw
”[7] To strip a foreign sovereign of immunity, such suit must involve (1) property taken in violation of international law, and (2)(a) such property must be present in the United States in connection with a commercial activity carried on by the foreign state, or (2)(b) must be possessed by an “agency or instrumentality” of the foreign state that also carries on commercial activity in the United States.[8] When claimants file… [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 9:56 am by Eugene Volokh
United States, the Supreme Court upheld the denial of a tax exemption to a university that banned interracial dating by its students, and that threatened to expel students who violated the ban.[7] Likewise, in Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
29 Jul 2023, 11:56 pm by Frank Cranmer
Religious freedom in the EU: a US perspective The United States Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) has released an Issue Update: Religious Freedom Concerns in The European Union. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:51 am
US, No. 2007-1220 19 C.F.R. section 181.53, a deferred duty regulation, does not violate the Export Clause, or Article I, Section 9, Clause 5 of the United States Constitution. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 6:37 pm by Kenneth Vercammen, Esq.
During the signing, my Aunt indicated that she wanted to make some minor changes to the percentages being distributed to some of the people in her [w]ill, and some handwritten changes were made at that time. [read post]
31 May 2019, 7:05 am by Andrew Hamm
” At The Daily Beast, Ronald Goldfarb argues that the 1967 case United States v. [read post]