Search for: "Good v. State" Results 4701 - 4720 of 44,366
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2011, 3:59 am by INFORRM
   In England and any other common law jurisdiction (outside the United States), the damages would, at most have been in the low tens of thousands of pounds. [read post]
10 May 2019, 11:37 am by MOTP
But it didn't do the individual much good, as the high court affirmed the lower courts' judgment in the bank's favor. [read post]
25 Feb 2021, 10:14 am by Howard Bashman
Sixth Circuit reinstates Ohio State University’s Lanham Act and state law right-of-publicity claims against Redbubble: You can access today’s ruling of the U.S. [read post]
10 Dec 2022, 6:12 am by centerforartlaw
For the decision, the Chamber stated the following: “…five mitigating circumstances, namely: (i) your admission of guilt; (ii) your cooperation with the Prosecution; (iii) the remorse and the empathy you expressed for the victims; (iv) your initial reluctance to commit the crime and the steps you took to limit the damage caused; and, (v) even if of limited importance, your good behavior in detention despite your family situation. [read post]
10 Dec 2022, 6:12 am by centerforartlaw
For the decision, the Chamber stated the following: “…five mitigating circumstances, namely: (i) your admission of guilt; (ii) your cooperation with the Prosecution; (iii) the remorse and the empathy you expressed for the victims; (iv) your initial reluctance to commit the crime and the steps you took to limit the damage caused; and, (v) even if of limited importance, your good behavior in detention despite your family situation. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 11:14 am by Larry Catá Backer
Ames, 188 U.S. 321 (1903) (Commerce power extended to prohibiting commerce in certain goods, in this case shipping Paraguayan lottery tickets across state lines);  Swift and Company v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 3:05 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The plaintiff failed to demonstrate prima facie that the defendants "[1] regularly do[ ] or solicit[ ] business, or engage[ ] in any other persistent course of conduct, or derive[ ] substantial revenue from goods used or consumed or services rendered, in the state," or "[2] expect[ ] or should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derive[ ] substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce" (CPLR 302[a][3][i], [ii];… [read post]
25 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE V Neither of the Contracting Parties shall be bound to deliver up its own citizens under this Treaty, but the executive authority of each shall have the power to deliver them up, if, in its discretion, it be deemed proper to do so. [read post]