Search for: "DOES I-X" Results 4741 - 4760 of 7,402
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2017, 11:46 am by Eugene Volokh
This rule is categorical, and does not leave room for judicial discretion. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 11:24 am by Richard Hunt
SWBC Real Estates Services, LLC, No. 3:23-CV-00970-X, 2024 WL 1123035, at *5 (N.D. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 9:29 pm by Ilya Somin
I covered this point in my earlier critique of Lech: The fact that the "police power" may have been involved does not normally immunize the government from takings liability. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 11:24 am by Richard Hunt
SWBC Real Estates Services, LLC, No. 3:23-CV-00970-X, 2024 WL 1123035, at *5 (N.D. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 5:05 am by Eugene Volokh
App'x 461, 463 (9th Cir. 2014); Hooters of Am., Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 7:03 pm
LexBlog: What does the future hold for LaBovick & LaBovick? [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 9:07 am by Eugene Volokh
If one does, the sign could convey a permissible "on-premises" message. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
For thy part, I do wish thou wert a dog, that I might love thee something. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 9:22 am by Samantha Rocco
This means that Jane’s “basis” in the shares is $50 (10 shares x $5 per share). [read post]
24 May 2009, 3:49 pm
" This vague reference to quality and safety standards is empty and meaningless because it does not specify what those standards are. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
And having to do things to prevent harmful animal incursions doesn't undermine our dignitary interests the same way that having to comply with human criminals' demands does. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 9:29 pm
[I should point out that in all of this, I agree with Francis Davey's comments on my 'Malcolm in brief' post. [read post]