Search for: "King v. State"
Results 4741 - 4760
of 5,397
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2016, 3:34 am
Rennert v S.M.R. [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 6:37 pm
-led wars in Iraq and Afghanistan had little justification in the internationallaw the United States claimed to be upholding, and the United States prosecuted the wars whileindifferent to the civilian casualties they imposed. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 5:53 am
And after Brown v. [read post]
6 Nov 2022, 1:09 am
And finally…II Hargreaves v The District Probate Court [2022] EWHC 2605 (Ch) or, “What court would Jesus sue in? [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 2:17 am
Kings County 2008). [read post]
3 May 2011, 2:09 pm
King, et al. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 2:02 pm
Sarnoff, BIO v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 3:21 am
(Justice Carolyn Demarest’s opinion in Board of Managers v Chocolate Partners, LLC, 2014 NY Slip Op 50754(U) [Sup Ct Kings County 2014] and the Bankruptcy Court’s opinion in In re Die Fliedermaus LLC, 323 BR 101 [SDNY 2005], are good places to start for anyone interested in learning more on the subject.) [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm
In Sheetz v. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 6:09 am
Kings Cty. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 2:02 pm
Sarnoff, BIO v. [read post]
29 Dec 2024, 4:34 pm
Despite some judicial remarks in earlier decisions suggesting that serious harm might, in appropriate circumstances, be decided by way of preliminary issue (see, for example, Warby J, as he then was, in Hamilton v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2020] EWHC 59 (QB)), it is now generally accepted that serious harm is best decided at trial, a position endorsed by paragraph 17.34 of the King’s Bench Guide 2024. [read post]
30 Oct 2024, 5:01 am
And New York Times v Sullivan (1964) overturned the Alabama Supreme Court's defamation decision against supporters of Martin Luther King, who placed an ad in the New York Times, limiting the ability of public officials to sue for defamation. [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm
As the unanimous Court said in the 1974 Watergate Case, United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 11:33 am
Satterfield v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 8:02 am
KNAPIK, PLAINTIFF, V. [read post]
16 Jul 2022, 1:00 am
In his ruling on A & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Health [2014] EWHC 1364 (Admin) Mr Justice King held that the claimant, whose ordinary/usual residence was in Northern Ireland, was not entitled to access in England abortion services free of charge. (13 May 2014). [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 4:19 am
” The Pachter Case With all of this law as a backdrop, in Pachter v Winiarsky, Decision and Order [Sup Ct, Kings County Index No. 502779/2020], the Court considered two novel questions: (i) does the doctrine of common-law dissolution apply to LLCs; and (ii) is common-law LLC dissolution potentially available to a co-equal, 50% member. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 8:00 am
Magliocca makes a good case for why such appeals to fixity were likely unavoidable in the United States. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 5:11 am
Early cases, such as the 1803 Runkle v. [read post]
