Search for: "Towne v. Towne" Results 4741 - 4760 of 8,458
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2017, 3:01 am by Walter Olson
” [Ted Folkman, Eriq Gardner, earlier] A sad catalogue of litigation abuse enabled by PETA’s donors [Frank Bednarz thread] Lively First Circuit opinion upholds extortion conviction of small town police chief [Bob Dunn, Berkshire Eagle, U.S. v. [read post]
The mining waste also polluted the nearby Paraopeba River and flooded homes downstream in the nearby town of Brumadinho. [read post]
2 Mar 2007, 11:12 am
Va.The Culpeper paper reports here that the town of Culpeper keeps paying for the big case it settled before trial, including $20,000 in expert witness fees.Posts here and here examine the Fourth Circuit's opinion in U.S. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 3:05 pm
If they didn't investigate that possibility, which was suggested in the press last week, what good are they to the town industry? [read post]
6 Jun 2015, 10:40 pm by Patricia Salkin
Frigault v Town of Richmond Planning Board, 2015 WL 2401337 (NYAD 3 Dept. 5/21/2015) The opinion can be accessed at: http://law.justia.com/cases/new-york/appellate-division-third-department/2015/518840.html Filed under: Current Caselaw - New York, Special Use/Exception, Wind Development [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 11:39 am
Remove corrupt town officials and win the local deadly showdown contest.Legal? [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 10:41 pm
Finally, Part V compares building green as a moral and as a legal obligation in a world of uncertain possibilities and unintended consequences. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 12:28 pm by Sheldon Toplitt
Stat. secs. 201.430-440, which restrict bawdy house advertising.The restrictions, among other things, prohibit brothel ads in counties in which the oldest profession is still illegal pursuant to an ordinance or statute, and bars bordello ads in counties recognizing legalized prostitution in "any public theater, on the public streets of any city or town, or on any public highway. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 10:50 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
In Matter of Blandeburgo v Zoning Board of Appeals of Town of Islip, the Court held that the Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA) had conducted the proper balancing test and had concluded that the variance from 18 feet to 8.8 feet was substantial, adversely impacted the neighborhood and was self created. [read post]