Search for: "DOES I-X"
Results 4761 - 4780
of 7,402
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2012, 1:12 pm
This certainly does not appear to be a big deal. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 9:06 am
FW: Defendants’ Petition for Certiorari in Milward – DENIED Inbox x Nathan A. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 8:42 pm
On one view, of course it does not. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 7:10 pm
(which does happen). [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 2:04 am
The reporter promised X his undertaking of confidentiality would remain so long as McIntosh was convinced that X had not deliberately misled him. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 2:27 pm
The current draft minutes (from the December 2011 meeting) are dense, informative, and dare I say absorbing. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 4:26 am
It is not a violation of the state’s criminal laws for 40 a patient or primary caregiver to engage or assist in the 41 medical use of cannabis pursuant to this section, except as 42 otherwise provided in subsections (g) and (i). 43 (c)? [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 2:00 am
I’m sure your competitors are doing it – get to work! [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 2:35 pm
She was rushed to hospital and doctors examining her discovered a fractured arm which showed up on x-ray as being two or three days old. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 1:30 pm
Accidents happen but that does not mean you should have to suffer without recourse from the negligent party. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 3:20 am
These unjust factors are, without attempting to be exhaustive: (i) mistake (this is the archetypal unjust factor); (ii) undue influence and duress and (iii) failure of consideration. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 9:20 pm
In other words, the policy does not specify which persons an officer must search—for instance, by requiring that every person’s closed containers be searched—nor does the policy specify how intrusive any given search may be—for instance, by requiring that closed containers be examined only by x-ray as opposed to a visual search. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 11:30 am
Because you are not in custody, the officer does not have to read you your rights before asking very incriminating questions. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 1:13 pm
"I've been driving for 'X number' of years, " they'll say, "and I haven't had any trouble. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 5:01 am
Fourth, this complexity is yet another example of why, in Punting on Taxes, I reiterated the point I made in Tax Politics and Economic Uncertainty that playing politics with tax and economic policy is a dangerous game. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
For more on the cultural significance of these posters, see Steve Estes's book, "I am a Man: Race, Manhood, and the Civil Rights Movement. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 10:00 pm
Taken together, these two figures yield a combined realization rate of approximately 77% (0.89 X 0.87=0.7743). [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 3:13 pm
What can I say? [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 6:02 am
It does not apply to MLM programs. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 5:59 pm
The marching orders were that (1) "[t]he name should help communicate that Website X is the ultimate interactive destination for TV and Movie fans," and (2) "the name should somehow tie back to Comcast, [but] the name Comcast should not be used. [read post]
