Search for: "Felts v. State" Results 4761 - 4780 of 5,753
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2022, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  Bickel trusted the Court to discern our deepest “fundamental values,” such as a commitment to racial justice that required the invalidation of segregation in Brown v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 4:50 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
By doing so, the Court may have felt constrained to conclude that the proposed intervenors were essentially proposing to proceed derivatively but without counsel, prohibited under Park. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  To a political scientist, one way is by viewing it as a power play by the rabbinate, an attempt many centuries before the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Cooper v Aaron to engage in a performative utterance establishing themselves as the “ultimate interpreters” of the document in question, whether the Torah or the Constitution. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 8:51 am by Alexandra Gutierrez
VERRILLI: With Congress, it’s true there have been times in the [United States v.] [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:03 am by stevemehta
Civil Action No. 09-1931 (RMU), No. 12., 13 United States District Court, District of Columbia. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 3:24 am
It is true that the placing of data on a server in one state can make the data available to the public of another state but that does not mean that the party who has made the data available has committed the act of making available by transmission in the State of reception. [read post]