Search for: "Akhil Amar"
Results 461 - 480
of 571
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2019, 10:10 am
In contrast, Akhil Amar maintained that “the senior associate justice might presumably fill in temporarily” during a presidential impeachment trial if the Chief Justice had resigned. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
To see why, readers could do no better than to read the terrific amicus brief by law professors Akhil Amar, Vik Amar, and Steve Calabresi. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 7:00 am
By adding amendments as “new [constitutional] texts rather than directly editing old ones,” Akhil Amar (2005, 460) has observed, “We the People have made amends without hiding our past mistakes. [read post]
9 Jun 2025, 1:02 pm
[The right to a civil jury trial is far more deeply rooted in American history and tradition than is the right to own guns, which the Supreme Court was right to incorporate.] [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 9:20 am
It is fair enough to cite Akhil Amar here, but Mitchell has to realize Amar thinks his position is a "gimmick" or worse. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:48 pm
Akhil Amar's amicus brief, and a New York Times guest essay, tried to sell a Brandeisian 50-state solution for electing the President. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 6:30 am
This seems to be the prevailing view from Michael McConnell, Akhil Amar, Jeffrey Rosen, Mark Movsesian, David French, and others. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 2:02 pm
My good friend and casebook co-editor Akhil Amar will no doubt remind me that secession is "unconstitutional. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 6:00 am
Board of Education (thanks to Akhil Amar for reminding me of this example). [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 6:00 am
Progressive constitutional scholars like Akhil Amar and Jack Balkin at Yale, and progressive lawyers like Elizabeth Wydra at the Constitutional Accountability Center, have labored for decades to lay the foundations for a progressive and originalist resistance to a conservative juristocracy. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 6:26 am
[1] My fellow Balkinization blogger Mark Tushnet has suggested, and amici Akhil and Vik Amar have argued, that the Court should opt for a fourth option—namely, to affirm the legality of Colorado’s refusal to place Trump’s name on the primary election ballot without deciding the substantive question of his eligibility to be President. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 1:54 am
By my count, there were three: Sandy Levinson, Larry Tribe, and Akhil Amar. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 10:50 am
As Vikram Amar and Akhil Amar explain in a 2022 article, at the Founding, “the public meaning of state ‘legislature’ was clear and well accepted . . . : A state ‘legislature’ was . . . an entity created and constrained by its state constitution. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 6:29 am
As Akhil Amar argued in his Harvard Law Review essay on Heller, the Court, especially its conservative cohort (all educated at "the very best schools") are egregiously ignorant of the details of our history, especially with regard to the runup to the War and its aftermath in Reconstruction. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm
In today’s column, I criticize its reliance on the views of liberal scholars.In a single paragraph, Justice Alito cites John Hart Ely, Archibald Cox, Laurence Tribe, Mark Tushnet, Philip Bobbitt, and Akhil Amar for the proposition that the reasoning of Roe v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 5:29 am
” At Slate, Akhil Amar offers advice on what Solicitor General Verrilli “should have said. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 7:46 am
Akhil Amar and a pre-Bruen essay by Prof. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 8:11 am
Lash does not accurately describe the work of Akhil Amar, Jack Balkin, Andrew Koppelman, Donald Regan, Robert Stern, and others. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 2:03 pm
Apropos the current discussion of unilateral presidential power, much of which is dominated by Yale faculty, former and present, and Yale alumni, Ike turns out to be a classic Whig, totally out of sympathy, I think it is fair to say, not only with the executive-branch exuberance expressed most strongly by John Yoo, but also, I strongly suspect, with a milder version, by Akhil Amar, whose contribution to Slate was titled "Bomb Away, Mr. [read post]
20 May 2007, 9:57 am
A very important goal of the casebook that I co-edit (along with Jack, Akhil Reed Amar, and Reva Siegel)is to raise just such questions about personal and institutional competence. [read post]
