Search for: "Akhil Amar"
Results 461 - 480
of 566
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2024, 9:20 am
It is fair enough to cite Akhil Amar here, but Mitchell has to realize Amar thinks his position is a "gimmick" or worse. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:48 pm
Akhil Amar's amicus brief, and a New York Times guest essay, tried to sell a Brandeisian 50-state solution for electing the President. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 6:00 am
Progressive constitutional scholars like Akhil Amar and Jack Balkin at Yale, and progressive lawyers like Elizabeth Wydra at the Constitutional Accountability Center, have labored for decades to lay the foundations for a progressive and originalist resistance to a conservative juristocracy. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 2:02 pm
My good friend and casebook co-editor Akhil Amar will no doubt remind me that secession is "unconstitutional. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 6:26 am
[1] My fellow Balkinization blogger Mark Tushnet has suggested, and amici Akhil and Vik Amar have argued, that the Court should opt for a fourth option—namely, to affirm the legality of Colorado’s refusal to place Trump’s name on the primary election ballot without deciding the substantive question of his eligibility to be President. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 6:30 am
This seems to be the prevailing view from Michael McConnell, Akhil Amar, Jeffrey Rosen, Mark Movsesian, David French, and others. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 6:00 am
Board of Education (thanks to Akhil Amar for reminding me of this example). [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 6:29 am
As Akhil Amar argued in his Harvard Law Review essay on Heller, the Court, especially its conservative cohort (all educated at "the very best schools") are egregiously ignorant of the details of our history, especially with regard to the runup to the War and its aftermath in Reconstruction. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 10:50 am
As Vikram Amar and Akhil Amar explain in a 2022 article, at the Founding, “the public meaning of state ‘legislature’ was clear and well accepted . . . : A state ‘legislature’ was . . . an entity created and constrained by its state constitution. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 1:54 am
By my count, there were three: Sandy Levinson, Larry Tribe, and Akhil Amar. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm
In today’s column, I criticize its reliance on the views of liberal scholars.In a single paragraph, Justice Alito cites John Hart Ely, Archibald Cox, Laurence Tribe, Mark Tushnet, Philip Bobbitt, and Akhil Amar for the proposition that the reasoning of Roe v. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 9:33 am
As early as the mid-1990s, Tillman noticed that even textualist scholars, most notably Akhil Reed Amar, treated the Constitution's offices and officers language as if every title meant the exact same thing. [read post]
Federal Judge Suggests Abortion May Be Protected Under 13th Amendment’s Ban on Involuntary Servitude
7 Feb 2023, 4:56 am
Akhil Reed Amar & Daniel Widawsky, Child Abuse as Slavery: A Thirteenth Amendment Response to DeShaney, 105 Harv. [read post]
2 Oct 2021, 4:22 am
The negative side, argued by Yale prawf Akhil Reed Amar and Supreme Court litigator Carter Phillips, argued two basic point, first that the perspective provided by Lithwick and Brummer was nuts, for which they were duly chastised by the moderator since calling a completely baseless assertion of hysteria nuts isn’t allowed in a polite debate. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 4:05 pm
I don’t know if Kurt Lash (Loyola LA) thinks Obamacare is unconstitutional, but he does think that Akhil Amar’s 14th Amendment argument in favor is incorrect. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 1:24 pm
Ian Ayres and Akhil Amar propose giving law students a rebate of half a year's tuition if they quit after first years. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:28 am
At the Washington Post’s Wonkblog, Ezra Klein interviews Akhil Amar and Charles Fried on the constitutionality of the individual mandate. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 5:31 am
Akhil Amar and Rob Natelson have written more extensively on this.) [4.] [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 7:23 am
I mean, I had to find some Yale guy, Akhil Reed Amar, who wrote a 1994 Harvard Lampoon, I mean Law Review, article to get a negative. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 6:58 am
As Robert Stern, Donald Regan, Akhil Amar, Jack Balkin, Andrew Koppelman, and other scholars have concluded, the Committee was embracing, not rejecting, the Resolution’s concern about interstate collective action problems when it provided an enumeration. [read post]
