Search for: "Barrett v. State"
Results 461 - 480
of 1,886
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2022, 9:10 pm
[See United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:10 pm
[See United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 4:24 am
United States, which starts this way (per Barrett):The Double Jeopardy Clause protects a person from being prosecuted twice “for the same offence. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 9:30 pm
Mencken’s constitution.Al Brophy (UNC Law) has posted some thoughts on the famous case State v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 8:08 am
And if the Griswold court could find privacy in the penumbra, could not the Barrett Court find Jesus in the penumbra? [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 10:49 pm
[Counterman v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 3:00 am
Here is the opinion: United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 5:49 am
It is styled, Schaffer v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 1:44 pm
(NA)Today the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Devillier v. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 1:57 pm
A fractured US Supreme Court ruled Monday in Wooden v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 9:26 am
In Dunn v. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 9:00 pm
After Bush v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:10 am
Fourth, United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 3:45 pm
Justice Barrett observes that immunity will protect the ex-President in his state court cases — where it is especially needed:Let me ask you about state prosecutions because, if the president has some kind of immunity that's implicit in Article II then that immunity would protect him in -- from state prosecutions as well. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 7:36 am
Lackey was assigned to a case called Jones et al v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 7:38 am
Adams, a First Amendment case about whether Delaware can choose its state judges based on party affiliation, and Texas v. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
In Trump v. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 2:33 pm
United States mirrors the claims from Trump impeachment 1.0] In Trump v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 5:30 am
”] [This post is co-authored with Seth Barrett Tillman.] [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 9:51 am
The court says knowledge is irrelevant to Section 230 (cites to Barrett and Jones v. [read post]
