Search for: "C. G., Matter of" Results 461 - 480 of 3,967
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2014, 9:00 am by Phyllis Pollack
A few weeks ago, a colleague Esther C. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
(b) The mist generator comprises a mist channelling funnel (Nebelkanaltrichter), and the water level sensor is provided at the height of the bottom edge of the mist channelling funnel(c) The water reservoir comprises a water overflow pipe (Wasserüberlauf) at the height of the water level sensor.As the present main request corresponds to t [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 7:44 am by Andrew Frisch
Regions Financial Corporation  This case was before the court for consideration of the parties’ Joint Statement regarding restrictions on communications with putative class members, as required by L.R. 23.1(C)(2) of the Northern District of Georgia. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 11:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Example: Larrikin Music Pub’g v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 3:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" The City contended that such documents fell within the statutory exemption for inter-agency and intra-agency materials under FOIL, citing Public Officers Law §87[2][g]. [read post]
26 May 2015, 5:00 am by Kate Fort
(In re Mary G. (2007) 151 Cal.App.4th 184, 208.) [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 4:05 am by Roel van Woudenberg
Even so, the subject-matter of claim 1 according to both requests also involves an inventive step.VIII. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 8:26 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Nor was it was unreasonable.The record contains substantial evidence to support the Commissioner's finding that Zaic is entitled to a compensatory damages award of $5,000 (Executive Law § 297[4][c][iii]; Matter of Framboise Pastry Inc. v New York City Commn. on Human Rights, 138 AD3d 532, 533 [1st Dept 2016]; see Matter of New York City Tr. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:11 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix Chambers.
In the Matter of S (a child), heard 20 February 2012. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 2:47 pm
[The underlying rationale was to encourage the rights holder to make use of TPMs and “thereby voluntarily contribute to the proper application of the private copying exception” ([72]) – although whether this is practicable at a commercial level is an entirely separate matter...]Rights holder’s consent for private copying uses (Question 1(a)-(b); Ruling 5)Q. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Moreover, G 2/10 points out that G 1/03 refers exclusively to undisclosed disclaimers (see G 2/10 [3.9]). [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 10:32 am by Heather Douglas
There are large backlogs and staff shortages. c. [read post]