Search for: "California v. Law" Results 461 - 480 of 34,077
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Dec 2016, 10:20 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
On December 23, 2016, the California Supreme Court issued its long-anticipated decision in Augustus v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 7:01 pm by Andrew Siegel
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Parker Drilling Management Service, Ltd. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 12:53 pm
by James Pugh On July 22, 2009, the California Court of Appeals issued a ruling that could send California’s affordable housing laws into a tailspin. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 10:33 am by Matthew J. Roberts, Esq.
Roberts, Labor Law Helpline Manager, Employment Law Counsel/Subject Matter Expert  CalChamber members can read more about Camp v. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 6:00 pm by Lorna Jaynes
California law also gives grandparents the right to spend time with their grandkids under certain circumstances. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 5:27 pm
The Ninth Circuit has partially revived a part of California's erstwhile Financial Information Privacy Law. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 5:15 pm by Dorsey
 The Court concluded that to accept the argument that the piece-rate pay included rest period compensation would be akin to averaging pay to comply with the minimum wage law, which is disallowed under California law pursuant to Armenta v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 10:16 am by Kent Scheidegger
The federal government sued California over a package of bills designed to hamper efforts to enforce federal immigration laws. [read post]
Superior Court, the California Supreme Court clarified many of the general requirements for meal and rest periods under California law. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 10:07 am by Leo Caseria and Thomas Tyson
The post California Jury Awards Millions to Cannabis Company in Antitrust Case appeared first on Antitrust Law Blog. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 8:40 am by The Law Office of Nancy King
The California Supreme Court issued a ruling yesterday that attempts to clarify state law regarding pandering. [read post]