Search for: "Company Doe v. Public Citizen" Results 461 - 480 of 1,747
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2024, 3:47 pm by Cooper Quintin
And the order does not address its effect on those outside the jurisdiction of Indian courts. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:35 pm by opseo
Unlike earlier generations, many senior citizens are retiring with large amounts of debt including a mortgage. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 3:25 pm
In the Lilly case, the court relied on the fact that Lilly employed UK citizens in the UK to prosecute parent company's patents. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 4:26 pm by INFORRM
The Court noted that US’s primacy to national security, public interest and law enforcement allowed for interference with the fundamental rights of persons whose data is transferred to that third country. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 7:55 am by JURIST Staff
Or, in other words, does the law compensate citizens for the wrong done to them due to breaches of duty by public bodies? [read post]
24 May 2010, 11:11 am by Marvin Ammori
In Citizens United, Dean Kagan famously downplayed, if not abandoned, these rationales. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 10:47 pm by Josh Blackman
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, Chief Justice Roberts, citing Bowsher v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 6:48 am by Joshua R. Goodbaum
He claimed that Comcast’s refusal to negotiate with ESN violated the first section of the Civil Rights Act of 1866 (https://codes.findlaw.com/us/title-42-the-public-health-and-welfare/42-usc-sect-1981.html), a Reconstruction-era law which provides that “[a]ll persons . . . shall have the same right . . . to make and enforce contracts . . . as is enjoyed by white citizens. [read post]