Search for: "Cox v. State"
Results 461 - 480
of 1,067
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2022, 9:09 am
Attorney General (a/k/a NetChoice v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 5:40 am
In Deborah Watts as Next Friend for Naython Kayne Watts v. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 3:45 pm
” Cox v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 2:54 am
Cox v Ergo Versicherung AG (formerly known as Victoria), heard 20 – 21 January 2014. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 8:36 am
” Cox v. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 8:03 am
Hawaii Department of Human Services (06-1267, cert. papers), involving a claim by blind vendors of a right to sue state and local government for denying them a preference in operating stands or vending machines in non-federal public buildings, and Cox v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 11:21 am
-Marbury v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 5:30 am
Thus, in Cox v Turkey (20 May 2010), the Strasbourg Court held that Article 10 was engaged by the ban on the re-entry of a US woman who had expressed strong views on issues of Kurdish assimilation and the treatment of Armenians. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 9:30 pm
His book, M’Culloch v. [read post]
3 Mar 2007, 6:51 am
Cox v. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 12:40 pm
State v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 7:58 am
Jody Freeman is the Archibald Cox Professor of Law at Harvard Law School, and director of the law school’s Environmental Law Program. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 7:14 pm
As the California Court of Appeals stated in 2007 in Rapid v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 9:04 am
He also argued that Gersh did not allege a sufficient basis under state law. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 7:18 am
Supreme Court had invalidated a similar provision about civilians wearing military uniforms in Schacht v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 5:22 am
“That strikes me as plain and simple laundering of the deal,” says Cox. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 4:20 am
Coverage of the Court’s decision in Schuette v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 4:22 am
Higgins, 19 F.3d 1126, 1135 (6th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 875, 115 S.Ct. 203, 130 L.Ed.2d 134 (1994); Cox v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 3:45 am
In State v. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 11:41 am
Amy Coney Barrett’s Judicial Philosophy Doesn’t Hold Up to Scrutiny By Angus King Jr., United States Senator, Maine and Heather Cox Richardson, Professor of History, Boston College Angus King Jr. and Heather Cox Richardson argue against originalism—the method of legal interpretation that favors interpreting the Constitution or laws based strictly on their original meaning—and for an interpretative philosophy that looks to the ideals and intent of… [read post]
