Search for: "English v. State"
Results 461 - 480
of 6,446
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2018, 1:34 pm
” Rag, MerriamWebster Dictionary, https://www.merriamwebster.com/dictionary/rag (last visited May 29, 2018); accord Rag, Oxford English Dictionary, http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/157425 (last visited May 29, 2018). [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 6:30 am
The case is United States of America v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 12:54 pm
This morning’s oral argument in National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 1:27 am
Supreme Court issued its opinion in Morrison v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 3:11 am
California and United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 12:26 pm
Charitable Corporation v SuttonV. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 3:29 am
In Clinton David Jacobs v Motor Insurance Bureau [2010] EWCA Civ 1208, the Court of Appeal held that where a person is injured by an uninsured driver and is entitled to recover from the Motor Insurers Bureau (MIB), that person is entitled to recover damages assessed according to English law, rather than the law where the accident occurred.The appellant, Mr Jacobs (a resident of the UK) was seriously injured when struck by a car while holidaying in Spain. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 1:42 am
English Courts try to follow what they understand the law as interpreted by the European Patent Office to be; they then state this law in a relevant decision. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 5:03 am
See Nazari v. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 2:20 pm
Ali v Birmingham City Council [2009] EWCA (not reported yet. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 10:43 am
Wang v. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 2:56 am
King Henry V walloped the French in 1415 at Agincourt. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 2:11 am
In relation to control, no material difference as regards the position of the state. 15.07: Thomas de la Mare QC takes the Court through the cases of Barnado and Mallin v Clark. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 8:30 am
V. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 5:58 am
Next week’s oral arguments in Friedrichs v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:16 am
Trump cannot withstand scrutiny.In its motion to dismiss in CREW et al. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 8:11 am
This was the first time in the English jurisdiction that an expert had been found to owe a fiduciary duty to its client. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 5:15 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 1:46 pm
Let’s talk about Friedrichs v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:12 am
STATE V. [read post]
