Search for: "Free v. State" Results 461 - 480 of 39,436
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2013, 8:00 am by Howard Friedman
United States Department of Justice, 2013 U.S. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 9:23 am
As explained by the Appeals Court, this case involves procedural challenges to a United States Forest Service Rule known as the "State Petitions Rule. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 9:14 am by marcorandazza
In my view, this was the single most important free speech case the United States Supreme Court has ever decided. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 9:14 am by marcorandazza
In my view, this was the single most important free speech case the United States Supreme Court has ever decided. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 2:07 am
NML Capital Ltd v Republic of Argentina Queen’s Bench Division “A foreign state was not entitled to claim sovereign immunity to avoid enforcement of a judgment validly obtained in another overseas jurisdiction. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:09 am by Eric Goldman
On Monday, a unanimous three-judge panel of the 11th Circuit issued an important Internet free speech opinion, NetChoice v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 3:03 am by Walter Olson
That’s not how it’s supposed to work [my Free State Notes on a Maryland “cyberbullying” bill] Local laws requiring government contractors to disclose/disclaim ties to the anti-Israel BDS movement have rightly come under criticism. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 2:55 am by tracey
MM (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department: [2012] EWCA Civ 135;  [2012] WLR (D)  36 ” ‘Conspicuous unfairness’ was not a free standing ground in an immigration case on which a court could act in the absence of unlawful action on the part of the Home Secretary.” WLR Daily, 24th January 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 5:56 pm by INFORRM
The decision handed down last week by the United States Supreme Court in United States v Stevens shows the radically different approach taken in the United States in relation questions of “extreme” and “offensive” freedom of expression. [read post]
18 May 2021, 9:25 am by Robbie Stern
On 10 May 2021, the Supreme Court heard the appeal in R (Majera) (formerly SM (Rwanda)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (“SSHD”). [read post]
The Supreme Court yesterday handed down judgment in TN, MA and AA (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] UKSC 40, in which the Court held that a breach of the family tracing duty in Regulation 6 of the Asylum Seekers (Reception Conditions) Regulations 2005 does not affect the rule in Ravichandran requiring asylum applications to be decided on the facts existing at the date of decision. [read post]