Search for: "Housing Authority v. Superior Court"
Results 461 - 480
of 827
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2024, 9:16 pm
The Court also dismissed the student housing plaintiffs’ complaint. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 12:09 pm
The FTT decision had been made before the Court of Appeal judgment in Rakusen v Jepson (our note) on the liability of a superior landlord to sub-tenants for an RRO, but that judgment was not of direct application here on the facts. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:07 am
Last Week in the Courts Fancourt J heard closing submissions in the trial of Various Claimants v MGN. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 2:42 pm
Housing Authority (1988) 200 Cal.App.3d 635 and Nishihama v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 8:05 pm
The government argues that Munoz is “the superior vehicle” for resolving the issue. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 8:53 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Sierra Club v. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
Almeida-Perez, No. 07-2602, 07-2635 In a prosecution of two brothers for being illegal aliens in possession of firearms that had been transported in interstate commerce, denial of defendants' motion to suppress evidence is affirmed over claims that the district court erred in: 1) finding that police reasonably relied on the real or apparent authority of defendants' cousin to consent to police entry of their house; 2) finding that other occupants of their… [read post]
13 Jun 2021, 8:47 pm
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice recently released the decision in Working Families Ontario v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 11:47 am
Superior Court (Cargill). [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 9:29 am
Superior Court): [Plaintiff] alleges [that] … DPH caused the suspension of Alliance's Twitter account. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 8:00 am
Harris v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 9:41 pm
Supreme Court case, Miranda v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 9:39 am
The State responded the next day by filing a Notice of Related Case with the Superior Court. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 9:39 am
The State responded the next day by filing a Notice of Related Case with the Superior Court. [read post]
6 Feb 2021, 9:10 am
One important one was that of Farmer v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 11:17 am
HIGH COURT SAYS, Wood v. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 1:15 pm
Save the Hill Group v. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 11:10 am
The lawsuit is American Society of Journalists and Authors Inc. et al. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 12:28 pm
Sheffield City Council v Oliver LRX/146/2007 meant that the covenant applied by force of statute. b) If that was wrong, as a local housing authority the Council have wide powers to manage their stock as they see fit and it would not be consistent with the existence of these wide powers if individual leaseholders were able to demand that insurance must be provided in a particular manner or with a particular provider. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 12:28 pm
Sheffield City Council v Oliver LRX/146/2007 meant that the covenant applied by force of statute. b) If that was wrong, as a local housing authority the Council have wide powers to manage their stock as they see fit and it would not be consistent with the existence of these wide powers if individual leaseholders were able to demand that insurance must be provided in a particular manner or with a particular provider. [read post]