Search for: "International Paper Co. v. United States" Results 461 - 480 of 742
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2013, 8:40 am
Reciting Seager v Copydex and Banks v EMI Songs, the former judge stated that 'where an inventor wanted to sell his idea for money, money is what he got'. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm by Howard Knopf
 It should be noted that some believe that the execution on paper of an assignment of copyright to a Canadian entity will entitle it to block parallel imports in accordance with the Kraft decision. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:30 am by Benjamin Wittes
  This is not something to be done “on the papers,” as they say in court. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 7:00 am by Benjamin Wittes
In the parlance of international law, the United States considers itself as fighting a “non-international armed conflict”—that is, an armed conflict against something other than another sovereign state. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 4:20 am by Benjamin Wittes
  The government need only demonstrate that the surveillance targets “persons reasonably believed to be located outside the United States” and seeks “foreign intelligence information. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
Revolutionary change and the law of war The law of war is codified in the United Nations Charter, international treaties, the body of international case law, and in customary principles of behavior during times of conflict. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 6:11 am by Victoria VanBuren
Strong, currently a Fellow of the Supreme Court of the United States for the 2012-13 term, is Associate Professor of Law at the University of Missouri and Senior Fellow at the award-winning Center for the Study of Dispute Resolution, having previously taught law at the University of Cambridge and the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 7:52 pm by Larry Catá Backer
Leading scholars who have researched and published in the area of socio-economic rights (especially those with expertise on China and/or India, or international human rights and development) will be presenting papers at this Conference. [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 12:38 pm by Schachtman
  As I noted in “Confusion Over Causation in Texas” (Aug. 27, 2011), the Texas Supreme Court managed to confuse general and specific causation concepts in its decision in Merck & Co. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 7:44 am by John Elwood
United States, 12-5271, for yesterday’s grant in McQuiggin v. [read post]
8 Sep 2012, 8:01 am by Mikk Putk
At international level for example, the International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO), the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), and the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) have existed for more than 50 years. [read post]