Search for: "Michigan v. United States" Results 461 - 480 of 3,240
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Aug 2012, 1:33 pm by WIMS
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 3:33 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States Court of Federal Claims. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 1:16 pm by WIMS
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 9:37 am by Native American Rights Fund
United States Federal Trial Courts Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/dct/2015dct.htmlBorrichio v. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 1:39 pm by WIMS
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 3:53 pm by NARF
Southcentral Foundation (Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act; Tribal Organization; Employment) United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 1:26 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 10:50 am by Bill Amadeo
Florida, the United States Supreme Court stated that the 8th Amendment of the United States Constitution which can afford an argument that sentences can be cruel and unusual punishment can come into play. [read post]
21 Jul 2007, 8:28 am
In light of the United States Supreme Court's recent decision in Rita v. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 5:21 am by Timothy P. Flynn
"  Professor Mortenson asserted that the couple was properly married following Judge Friedman's ruling and that status cannot be undone, even if the SCOTUS reinstates Michigan's constitutional ban on gay marriage.Ever since the 5-4 SCOTUS ruling in United States v Windsor in 2012, same-sex marriage advocates and the ACLU have argued in lower courts across the nation that the case applies to states' power to ban same-sex… [read post]
18 May 2007, 2:04 pm
Moreover, the United States explains, the Sixth Circuit's decision does not conflict with the decision of any other court of appeals. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 12:57 pm
NOTE: The district court noted that the United States Supreme Court “has specifically declined to rule on the question of what happens to unclaimed funds in a class action. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 12:38 am
United States, 464 U.S. 814 (1983). [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 2:32 am
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan granted summary judgment to an excess insurer and held that the excess policy would not be triggered until the underlying limits were exhausted by actual payment from the primary carrier. [read post]