Search for: "Mines v. State"
Results 461 - 480
of 3,449
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2013, 9:09 am
” PPG Indus., Inc., 75 F.3d at 1564 (citation and quotation omitted).ANDSee United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 3:01 pm
Most recently, a federal court in Rushton v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 11:10 am
So heavy was the defense of corporate expression in the opening stages of the argument in Sorrell, et al., v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 2:05 am
But in a 2009 ruling, Caperton v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 3:00 am
The state (Massachusetts) denied the claim and the appeals court upheld the state's decision. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 9:32 am
This was the position clearly taken by the Court in 1940, in United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2024, 11:13 am
As with last week’s argument in Facebook v. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 5:56 am
Öhman J:or Fonder AB v. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 3:09 pm
It reversed and remanded to the district court.Lobbins v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 6:53 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 1:13 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 9:01 pm
At 11 a.m., the Court is scheduled to hear argument in United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 3:20 pm
H.R.2156: To amend the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 to provide funds to States and Indian tribes for the purpose of promoting economic revitalization, diversification, and development in economically distressed communities through the reclamation and restoration of land and water resources adversely affected by coal mining carried out before August 3, 1977, and for other purposes. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 3:20 pm
H.R.2156: To amend the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 to provide funds to States and Indian tribes for the purpose of promoting economic revitalization, diversification, and development in economically distressed communities through the reclamation and restoration of land and water resources adversely affected by coal mining carried out before August 3, 1977, and for other purposes. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 10:50 am
Christopher Slobogin (Vanderbilt Law School) has posted Making the Most of Jones v. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 11:35 pm
While a limited number of Member States in the EU has already introduced (UK, France, Germany and Estonia: see here) or is planning to introduce (eg Ireland, on which see Katposts here and here) a specific text and data mining exception, in the context of the current copyright reform debate, a provision (Article 3) has been included in the draft Directive on copyright in the Digital Single Market. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 11:22 am
You can read the Supreme Court decision at Atlantic Richfield Co. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 9:08 am
United States is "awesome. [read post]
24 May 2023, 1:01 pm
United States Bureau of Reclamation (Rule 19, Water Rights) Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2023.html Eagle Bear, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 1:02 am
[The district court relied on a case of mine, United States v. [read post]
