Search for: "People v Poole" Results 461 - 480 of 1,401
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2010, 9:29 am by Rosalind English
But these motives are no more to the point than the motives of the council that charged a husband for admission to their pool while letting his wife in free; this discrepancy arose out of the discriminatory pensionable age provisions and therefore the council’s entire innocent motives – of allowing people of pensionable age free admission – had a discriminatory basis (James v Eastleigh Borough Council [1990] 2 AC 751. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
Mississippi, which asks whether a prosecutor’s repeated use of peremptory challenges to remove black people from the jury pool violated the Constitution. [read post]
21 Apr 2019, 8:17 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The system in Alberta was challenged on similar grounds in R. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 4:16 am by Edith Roberts
Mississippi, which asks whether a prosecutor’s repeated use of peremptory challenges to remove black people from the jury pool violated the Constitution, the justices could “put some teeth into Batson v. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 12:05 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
This was found to increase juror engagement and reduce instances of people ‘zoning out’. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 12:05 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
This was found to increase juror engagement and reduce instances of people ‘zoning out’. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 5:10 pm by The Charge
  Indeed, in the seminal case of Batson v. [read post]