Search for: "People v. Ing" Results 461 - 480 of 1,531
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
RFRA forbids the federal government from “substantially burden[ing]” anyone’s “exercise of religion”, unless the burden is the “least restrictive means” of furthering “a compelling government interest. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 5:06 am
Hoffman, supra.The court wnet on to outline the legal issues in the case and the standard it would apply in analyzing those issues:The Fourth Amendment protects the people against unreasonable searches and seizures and provides that warrants shall not be issued absent probable cause. [read post]
18 May 2012, 7:56 pm by Eugene Volokh
We find that the property fulfills the requirements of a charity because its primary use focuses on “bring[ing] people’s minds or hearts under the influence of … religion,” and it offers this charity on a nondiscriminatory basis. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 10:42 am by Ilya Somin
It has run wild through the state and federal courts for 30 years swallowing just compensation rights of ordinary people like Ms. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 5:42 pm by Jonathan Zasloff
A few days ago, District Judge Christina Snyder issued her 57-page ruling in American Trucking Ass’n v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 5:09 am by Susan Brenner
  Griffin said “he initially lied about his location because, as a pastor, he did not want people to know he was `cheating on [his] wife’ or `drinking. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
  The first clause—what John Vlahoplus helpfully refers to as the “Positions Clause”—identifies the government offices and other employments that a covered rebel or insurrectionist is prohibited from “hold[ing]. [read post]