Search for: "State v. B. W."
Results 461 - 480
of 4,254
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2015, 11:28 am
INS v. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 8:47 am
B. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019 In the matter of XY (AP) (Scotland), heard 13- 14 November 2019 R v Hilton (Northern Ireland), heard 2 December 2019 MacDonald & Anor… [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 1:03 pm
Sony v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to… [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 9:36 am
In County of Los Angeles v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 11:09 am
Med Trends Inc. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 10:00 am
Those were the questions reviewed by the New York State Court of Appeals in 328 Owners Corp. v. 330 W. 86 Oaks Corp. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 3:55 am
According to Li v. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 5:57 am
W. [read post]
4 May 2007, 5:50 pm
Signed April 11, 2007--Opinion by Chief Judge Duncan W. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 9:04 am
The contribution argues that the resulting context provides a basis for either for extending sovereign immunity to those regulatory responsibilities of all economic actors (irrespective of their public or private ownership) or of the reconception of sovereign regulation through legal compliance obligations as inherently commercial and thus not protected b principles of sovereign immunity when undertaken by SOEs. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 12:56 pm
Only 4 cited © cases: Mazer v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 6:17 am
The sheer audacity of trying to profit from information learned in such a confidential environment shocked the jurors – and McGee may spend some time in federal custody as a result (sentencing is set for February 13; United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 12:46 pm
Kirby B. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 12:37 pm
From State v. [read post]
15 Nov 2009, 11:18 pm
State, 371 Ark. 599, 606, 269 S.W.3d 326, 331 (2007) (quoting United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to… [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to… [read post]
