Search for: "State v. Losee" Results 461 - 480 of 13,158
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2011, 2:01 pm by Tiffany Chiao
Fox Business, The Willis Report, May 4, 2011 Host Gerri Willis http://video.foxbusiness.com/v/4677710 “We’re definitely losing some money through what’s called transfer pricing, where corporations operating in the United States, as well as other countries, find ways—legal ways typically—of locating their profits in countries that have lower tax rates. [read post]
5 May 2014, 11:54 am by Benjamin Minegar
United States [SCOTUSblog backgrounder] that the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act (MVRA) requires restitution calculation based upon the property a lender loses, not upon the collateral the lender receives. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 3:16 am
The Ninth Circuit Blog has a discussion of the en banc decision in United States v. [read post]
11 May 2017, 8:48 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The outcomeAylus Networks, Inc. appeals the United States District Court for the Northern District of California’s grant of summary judgment finding that Apple Inc. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 12:30 pm by Buckingham
States complain they are losing out on tax revenue because they cannot collect taxes from online retailers who lack a physical presence in the taxing state. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 7:43 am by Eugene Volokh
Wash.) in United Federation of Churches, LLC d/b/a The Satanic Temple v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 2:34 am by sally
That provision precluded national legislation which withdrew the award of a benefit, such as the supplement to invalidity benefit, from former Turkish migrant workers when they had returned to Turkey after losing their right to remain in the host member state after becoming incapacitated in the that member state. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 4:50 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Bessemer City, 470 U.S. 564, 574 (1985) (citingUnited States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 4:03 am by SHG
The court relied heavily on In re Hubbard, In Hubbard, the Eleventh Circuit relied heavily on United States v. [read post]