Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Laws" Results 461 - 480 of 49,470
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2018, 11:26 am by Jeffrey Carr
Not necessarily, given the way our laws currently work. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 5:42 pm
Hasen (Loyola Law School - Los Angeles) has posted Bush v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
Green, which is forthcoming in the Kentucky Law Journal:Few election law rulings seem more outdated than Colegrove v. [read post]
24 May 2015, 3:22 pm by Stephen Bilkis
2010 NY Slip Op 51103 The People of the State of New York v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 9:00 pm
Another important federal source of protection for transgender people is disability rights law—in particular, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 10:25 am by Eric Goldman
This potential wariness is bolstered by the actual title of the law—“Social media networks; hateful conduct prohibited”—which strongly suggests that the law is really aimed at reducing, or perhaps even penalizing people who engage in, hate speech online….social media users often gravitate to certain websites based on the kind of community and content that is fostered on that particular website. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 9:31 am
Pettinella successfully had the charge reduced to a violation after presenting case law to the prosecutors and pointing out inconsistencies in the charges following pre-trial hearings. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 7:20 am by INFORRM
   Neither Sim v Stretch nor Jameel are directed to the issue and provide no clear support for the approach. [read post]
1 May 2019, 3:21 pm
  But the Court of Appeal today makes state law money laundering cases even easier to prosecute than similar federal law cases, holding that Ninth Circuit precedent that requires "tracing" doesn't apply in California (and thereby disagreeing with a prior Court of Appeal opinion to the contrary).More bad news if you paid a lot of money to get your kid admitted to a college by pretending that s/he was an athlete. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In the words of the Appellate Division, "repeal of Civil Rights Law §50-a ... reflected a strong legislative policy promoting transparency of police disciplinary records and eliminated any claim of confidentiality in them" (see People v Castellanos, 72 Misc 3d 371)). [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In the words of the Appellate Division, "repeal of Civil Rights Law §50-a ... reflected a strong legislative policy promoting transparency of police disciplinary records and eliminated any claim of confidentiality in them" (see People v Castellanos, 72 Misc 3d 371)). [read post]