Search for: "Treat v. Superior Court" Results 461 - 480 of 1,838
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2019, 7:55 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
A recent decision of the Ontario Superior Court in Cormier v 1772887 Ontario Ltd., 2019 ONSC 587 (CanLII) involved the number of years of service that were included in the calculation of notice, whether a termination clause was valid, and also if inappropriate deductions were made from the employee’s pay. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 4:15 am
Employee required to answer employer's work-related inquiriesSpielbauer v County of Santa Clara [Calif.], Supreme Court of California, decided February 9, 2009. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 1:38 pm by Eric Goldman
Southwest Airlines, which this court oddly treats as supporting precedent even though the Lansing court (in an ugly opinion) rejected the employer’s Section 230 defense against a negligent supervision claim. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 1:38 pm by Ana Muñoz
  The judge who heard the case in the Superior Court agreed, and denied the motion on that basis. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:20 pm by Georgialee Lang
The titillating tale unfolds in the Reasons for Judgment from the Quebec Superior Court in A. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 10:20 am by admin
The Roverano plaintiff appealed from the Superior Court’s straightforward application of a remedial statute. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 3:28 pm
Superior Court (1971) 4 Cal.3d 545, 551, fn. 2 (Santa Clara) [Courts of Appeal “erred in reasoning that the limitation, because mandatory, was necessarily jurisdictional. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 8:41 am by Employment Lawyers
THE NEW JERSEY BOSS WHO TOLD GRIEVING MOTHER TO FORGET DECEASED DAUGHTER The Superior Court of New Jersey (one step above a Common Pleas court and one step below New Jersey's Supreme Court), issued a recent employment-law decision that has made national news. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 2:41 am
Plaintiffs sued in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, where the child was then being treated for the complications. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 6:22 am by Dan Bressler
” “The Superior Court determined Scranton firm Scanlon, Howley & Doherty violated a rule limiting the discovery of parties’ treating physicians when it took on the plaintiff’s surgeon as a client. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 3:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
However, as we see in a recent decision from the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Parekh et al v. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 3:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
However, as we see in a recent decision from the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Parekh et al v. [read post]