Search for: "White v. Wear" Results 461 - 480 of 795
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2009, 11:30 am
At the Supreme Court's first session in 1790, a single justice showed up wearing a white wig (Justice William Cushing) that he had worn on the Massachusetts bench. [read post]
17 May 2012, 3:19 am by SHG
As for the lack of punishment, indefinite detention may not be a sentence of imprisonment, but you still have to eat cheese sandwiches on white bread while wearing an unflattering jumpsuit. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 2:39 pm by Kashmir Hill
Kash told me I was looking for a dude carrying the Chicago daily law bulletin and wearing jeans, blue and white striped shirt, and black-framed glasses. [read post]
9 Nov 2024, 12:32 pm by Eugene Volokh
From Judge Terrence Berg's opinion on Election Day in ACLU of Mich. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 7:50 pm
– slow progress of NZ patent reform (PatLit)   Netherlands District Court The Hague – Ex parte decision against Drogisterij.net in extended wear contact lens patent dispute: Novartis v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 11:27 am by Shea Denning
Asheville police received a call that a white male in his thirties who was wearing a gray sweater that he had put on backwards had stopped his sports utility vehicle in the lane of travel on a city street. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 11:27 am by Shea Denning
Asheville police received a call that a white male in his thirties who was wearing a gray sweater that he had put on backwards had stopped his sports utility vehicle in the lane of travel on a city street. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 9:29 pm by HumaRashid
Men have it easy compared to women: they don’t have to ponder the great Pantsuit v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 8:45 pm
: District Court Delaware dismisses lawsuit by Pernod Ricard against Bacardi (IP tango)   US Trade Marks – Decisions CAFC affirms TTAB’s CRASH DUMMIES no abandonment decision: Mattel, Inc v The Crash Dummy Movie (TTABlog) TTAB precedential no 14: Noncommercial use defense to a dilution claim unavailable in a TTAB proceeding: American Express Marketing & Development Corp v Gilad Development Corporation (TTABlog) TTAB precedential no 13: Divided TTAB Panel… [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 11:59 am by Mark Walsh
Dreeben’s first argument was in a case called United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 10:58 am by John Elwood
It’s still early, but everywhere you look, you see people from up north wearing red suits with white fur trim deciding who has been “naughty” or “nice. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 10:40 pm by Kelly
(IPBiz) Australia FCA: No copyright in newspaper headlines: Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd v. [read post]