Search for: "Works v. State"
Results 461 - 480
of 61,588
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2014, 1:10 pm
On May 27, 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in State of Ohio v. [read post]
4 Jan 2015, 12:57 am
Bernard v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 11:57 am
Co. v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 2:57 am
It also held the Government’s belief that there are better long-term outcomes for children in households where an adult works to be a reasonable foundation. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 3:50 pm
On September 23, 2009, in Erdman v. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 6:33 am
State v. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 1:55 am
One might hope that states would be flexible, understanding why people may have little choice but to work out of state—particularly when state policies forbade working from the office—but the silence thus far raises concerns. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 7:12 pm
, works by scanning visitors??? [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 11:57 am
Attorney Jared Green received the Granite State Advocate Award for his work in making significant changes in the law of the state. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 1:36 am
In this post, Karen Denny, Zainab Hodgson and Kristyna Muhlfeitova, who all work at CMS and have a special interest in public international law, preview the decision awaited from the UK Supreme Court in the matter General Dynamics United Kingdom Limited v State of Libya, which concerns questions about how to enforce an arbitral award against a foreign state. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 10:30 am
Ed Durr praised a decision by the United States Supreme Court overturning Roe v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 7:02 am
§§ 2000bb to 2000bb-4)(“the RFRA”).[6] (Even though the RFRA was held unconstitutional as applied to state and local governments, City of Boerne v. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 7:48 pm
(When it later moved the INS from the Department of Justice to DHS, Congress transferred this and other authorities from the Attorney General to the DHS Secretary.)When the Texas v. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 6:04 am
Recently, however, Hatch-Waxman plaintiffs in Celgene Corporation v. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 11:42 am
It is nearly 60 years since the Supreme Court of the United States unanimously held, in Gideon v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 2:54 pm
The FWC’s reasoning The FWC concluded that the fundamental elements of an employment relationship were not present, stating that a contract of employment is a work-wages bargain[3], which requires a correlative obligation between the contracting parties, whereby the employee, on one side, performs the work required by the contract, and the employer, on the other side, pays for the work performed. [read post]
5 May 2017, 9:59 am
In Stovall v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 6:58 am
Here is a search of the first five months of 2010, which turned up a lot of great trial/appellate work by defenders. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 5:01 am
The Court noted that such cases were distinguishable from the case at hand, since most involved hearings to determine whether an indigent defendant was entitled to payment by the state for expert psychiatric testimony, but did not decide the issue, since the case at hand was resolved on other grounds.To be appealable, an order or judgment must ordinarily be final. [read post]
7 Jun 2008, 2:18 pm
The Court of Justice handed down an important judgment in Case C-164/07 James Wood v. [read post]
