Search for: "Borders v. Borders" Results 4781 - 4800 of 6,662
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Sep 2018, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
Here’s an excerpt: The Second Circuit ruled on August 24 in United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 10:49 am by Kevin
If it seems odd that there will (hopefully) soon be a case captioned Violent J and Shaggy 2 Dope, et al. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2008, 2:06 am
I skimmed parts of the book at Borders yesterday and it certainly would reward a full reading. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 7:51 am
 Personally, being North of the Border, our opinion was WGAS? [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 6:41 am by Jo Dale Carothers
  In what is seen as a big win for patent owners, the Court, in a 7-2 decision in WesternGeco v. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 6:19 am
Sama, and Jennifer Wieboldt, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, on Wednesday, July 11, 2018 Tags: Cross-border transactions, Morrison v. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm by Cary Coglianese
Customs and Border Protection (CBP). [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 9:56 am by Katharina Schmid (schmid-ip)
On appeal, the General Court (“GC”), in line with both lower instances, confirmed the descriptiveness of “Sophienwald” as a geographical indication (Ruling of 3 July 2024, T-597/22 – Sophienwald v EUIPO – Zalto Glas [Sw Sophienwald]). [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 11:32 am by Andrew Dat
  It’s sad to see the protections guaranteed by our Constitution and cultivated by cases like Katz v. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm by Joe Katz
In 2000, the United States declared measles eliminated within its borders. [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 12:01 am by Transplanted Lawyer
The government will attempt to kick-start mortgage lending and consumer credit with loan guarantees to banks; this will result in little economic growth, more bankruptcies, and increased governmental debt.Law and the Courts: The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals will affirm the trial court's ruling in Perry v. [read post]
11 May 2017, 7:02 am by Karel Frielink
The CCJ noted that this case was similar in circumstances to the previous case of Rudisa Beverages & Juices N.V. and Caribbean International Distributors Inc. v The State of Guyana. [read post]