Search for: "Harris v. Harris"
Results 4781 - 4800
of 7,464
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2007, 4:07 pm
OpinionPub DateShort Title/District 07a0254p.06 2007/07/10 Hartman v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 12:25 am
Becton, Dickinson is pending en banc: Advanced Magnetic Closures v. [read post]
4 Feb 2025, 12:14 pm
Penfold and Harris v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 4:13 am
The significance of this has been explored in a number of authorities including in particular ABB Lummus Global v Keppel Fels Ltd [1999] 2 LLR 24, C v D [2007] EWHC 1541 (at first instance) and [2007] EWCA CIV 1282 (in the Court of Appeal), Dubai Islamic Bank PJSC v Paymentech [2001] 1 LLR 65 and Braes of Doune v Alfred McAlpine [2008] EWHC 426. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:24 pm
Lucas v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 11:07 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:24 pm
Lucas v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 12:57 am
Associated Newspapers Ltd (ANL) is the corporate entity defending the case brought by the likes of Prince Harry, Sir Elton John and Doreen Lawrence. [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 5:10 pm
At the hearing it was alleged that the Sun had received illegally obtained phone records of Prince Harry’s ex-girlfriend. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 10:00 pm
Aug. 17, 2004); Harris v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 3:49 am
Harris (discussed here), but instead gave concurrent sentences. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 1:03 pm
Harris, No. 14-cv-00802, 2014 WL 4207599, at *2 (W.D. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 9:19 am
Ohio and Miranda v. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 7:08 am
She said, “The trial was called the United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 12:05 am
He ordered Harry to make an interim payment of £60,000 in legal costs to News Group Newspapers after ruling largely in favour of the publisher’s bid for a wider search for evidence. [read post]
6 Oct 2024, 4:03 pm
Fancourt J criticised Prince Harry’s individual claim in the phone hacking litigation against News Group Newspapers, stating that “the claim at times resembles more an entrenched front in a campaign between two obdurate but well-resourced armies than a claim for misuse of private information” and is “starting to absorb more than an appropriate share of the court’s resources” [9]. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 4:52 pm
Harris, 2007 U.S. [read post]
10 May 2012, 5:49 pm
Cal.); Harris v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 1:38 pm
Harris, 861 A.2d 165 (Super. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 4:52 pm
Harris, 2007 U.S. [read post]
