Search for: "Branch v. Mays"
Results 4801 - 4820
of 5,635
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2018, 6:21 pm
Sellers, McCoy v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 1:43 pm
Experience has instructed us that no skill in the science of government has yet been able to discriminate and define, with sufficient certainty, its three great provinces the legislative, executive, and judiciary; or even the privileges and powers of the different legislative branches. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 11:54 am
*****************************************"Like most other branches of the law, copyright law started out simple to understand and relevant to both the stakeholders and the technology which was available at the time. [read post]
13 Nov 2024, 7:30 am
And when lobbying legislators or senior executive branch officials, success often depends on convincing them that they can effectively explain their actions in a soundbite and fend off any resulting attack ads. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 11:28 am
Whole Foods[24] and United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 11:49 am
The Act bans insider trading by members of Congress and their staff as well as various other executive branch and judicial branch employees. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 2:37 pm
From Del Castillo v. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 6:30 am
We have retained a right to recover our slaves in whatever part of America they may take refuge, which is a right we had not before. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 2:21 pm
” It said, “[i]ndeed, not only has Congress imposed limits on the Executive Branch regarding when it may cancel a solicitation but also the Executive Branch has imposed limits upon itself via the FAR. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 7:16 pm
" Nasrallah v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 11:27 am
Co. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 3:19 pm
If my race is what I say it is, must I choose from a pre-established list of races, or may I invent a new word to describe my race? [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 11:27 am
Co. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:42 pm
In Citizens United v. [read post]
5 Dec 2024, 5:59 am
Those familiar with the caselaw in this area will know that the Supreme Court held in Holder v. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 3:25 pm
Maybe the best example I can think of is 1974, U.S. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 9:30 pm
Do we really need to be concerned that newspapers and the public misunderstand United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2025, 9:05 pm
., who originally issued a temporary restraining order affording federal employees more time to decide whether to accept the offer, held that the unions lacked standing to sue and that federal employees should have brought their complaints to designated personnel agencies within the executive branch rather than federal court. [read post]
12 May 2019, 9:01 pm
” Critics assert, in particular, that the president seems oblivious to a 1993 Supreme Court ruling, Nixon v. [read post]
13 Oct 2024, 9:01 pm
As the Supreme Court made clear in the 1946 seminal ruling in Bell v. [read post]
