Search for: "Doctor v. State"
Results 4801 - 4820
of 8,647
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2016, 7:31 am
Prosecutors say some of those patients were receiving powerful medications like fentanyl and OxyContin without a doctor’s prescription. [read post]
15 Oct 2016, 7:31 am
Prosecutors say some of those patients were receiving powerful medications like fentanyl and OxyContin without a doctor’s prescription. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:28 am
Lane; and (2) whether the United States Supreme Court has jurisdiction over a state court determination of retroactivity of a case on collateral review, when a state has both adopted and applied Teague. [read post]
Who is a Qualified Expert in a Florida Medical Malpractice Lawsuit? Florida Supreme Court to Decide.
16 Jul 2022, 9:39 am
The case, University of Florida and Shands Hospital v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 8:47 am
See Washington v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 3:00 am
State sanctioned apology-lies hide from our view those doctors that genuinely wish to apologize, while encouraging those that aren’t sorry to lie. 4. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 6:31 am
” In State v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 4:50 pm
Do those same precedents also protect her doctor’s right to decide whether to participate in abortion procedures? [read post]
12 Mar 2011, 9:48 pm
In the 2009 case Wyeth v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 6:28 am
Quinn, of Harris v. [read post]
28 May 2012, 10:52 am
For example, a 2007 forfeiture complaint filed in United States, v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 10:20 am
Ironworkers Local Union 68 v. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 4:57 am
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held in McCorvey v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 11:34 am
Meade v. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 12:06 pm
This is the fact pattern recently analyzed by the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals in Ziccarelli v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 4:16 pm
In United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 8:18 am
If anything, there may be a further shift from Dusseldorf, where I've only attended one patent trial so far (Huawei v. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 2:00 pm
The law was a frontal assault on our constitutional rights — in fact, the government of Guam argued that the right to abortion did not even apply to Guam at all — and was the most restrictive ban enacted in the United States since the Supreme Court had decided Roe v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 4:49 am
As we know, many of the key witnesses – plaintiff’s doctors – are in plaintiff’s home state, whereas with national and international pharmaceutical companies, corporate witnesses can be scattered far from defendant’s home state. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 1:37 pm
Fazlul Sarkar, once of Wayne State University, a case which IPBiz has not been covering. [read post]
