Search for: "Rosen"
Results 4801 - 4820
of 5,417
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2008, 9:13 am
In light of recent (and still somewhat murky) revelations in recent days, Jay Rosen and I asked three questions we hoped ABC would address. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 4:19 pm
Today, the plaintiffs lawyers — Stanford’s Mark Lemley, Keker & Van Nest’s Ashok Ramani and the local Connecticut counsel, David Rosen — filed a second amended complaint that names one of the defendants. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 3:10 pm
That report and a folo yesterday have been picked up by Jay Rosen and Dan Gillmor, who are joining Greenwald's campaign to pressure ABC to reveal its sources for the discredited reports. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 4:00 am
Pressthink’s Jay Rosen and I, among many others who care about the journalism craft, believe ABC has some big, vital questions to answer. [read post]
3 Aug 2008, 9:58 pm
Reading Jay Rosen (PressThink) and the sometimes hateful Jack Shafer (Slate) made me realize that these problems aren't new, and that criticism is necessary to ensure an accountable, accurate press.But it all makes me kind of sad. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 9:08 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKContracts
Count Seeking Specific Performance of Delivery Of Firm's Earning Statement Denied Dismissal
Rosen v. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 4:00 pm
Jeff Rosen's piece in the March NY Times Magazine, Supreme Court, Inc., pretty accurately captures the point.Now the question: How come? [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 7:01 am
" by Jeffrey Rosen (contending the Supreme Court has shifted to a pro-business philosophy), and this Slate blog post by Eric Posner (contending the Court is pro-free-market, not pro-business). [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 10:42 am
” Rosen v. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 3:23 am
Schwartz (Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz) wrote a very interesting and highly readable piece for the Policy Review entitled “Our Fractured Supreme Court: The Benefit of Unanimity and the Vanity of Dissent,” see here. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 6:31 pm
The New York law firm of Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, which represents companies and boards, hailed the CA ruling and concluded that the Supreme Court's reasoning would preclude shareholder bylaws that would prevent boards from adopting poison pills. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 6:40 am
Two TV stations in Saudi Arabia carried the opening of the conference live.A number of Jewish participants were among the 200 people invited to the Conference, including a prominent Irish-Israeli rabbi, David Rosen. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 6:40 am
Two TV stations in Saudi Arabia carried the opening of the conference live.A number of Jewish participants were among the 200 people invited to the Conference, including a prominent Irish-Israeli rabbi, David Rosen. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 10:00 pm
" Here's a copy of the invite we received: The Brennan Center Legal Series and its Steering Committee Members Michael Waldman (Brennan Center for Justice), Jim Johnson (Brennan Center board chair, Debevoise & Plimpton) Michele Balfour, Jeremy Creelan (Jenner & Block), Beth Golden, Professor Helen Hershkoff (NYU School of Law), Daniel Kolb (Davis Polk & Wardwell), Edward Labaton (Labaton Sucharow), Lawrence Pedowitz (Wachtell,… [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 5:06 pm
UPDATE: Jay Rosen is trying to nail down a definition for the expression “citizen journalist” here. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 12:57 pm
As my co-blogger Jeremy Rosen has observed, however, popular commentary on the Court's punitive damages decisions (and even some academic commentary, like this article by Erwin Chemerinsky) has often criticized the "conservative" court for the outcomes in those cases, without even seeming to notice that the most conservative justices on the court dissented from those opinions. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 11:16 pm
Rosen, Bien & Asaro also represents Zaylanin Southavilay, a Cham immigrant from Vietnam who says National Credit Acceptance told her she'd have to choose between her job and her religious practice. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 3:50 am
"The Supreme Court's Group Hug": Law Professor Jeffrey Rosen has this essay online at the web site of Time magazine. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 6:20 pm
Rosen, 240 F.R.D. 204, 208 (E.D. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 6:14 pm
" In a memo on the case, the law firm of Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, which represents directors and companies, noted that Delaware law "has generally limited the ability of shareholders pursuing special interests to recover their solicitation expenses. [read post]
