Search for: "DANIELS v. STATE"
Results 4821 - 4840
of 5,119
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2021, 5:11 am
(Daniel Seng’s more recent work with a similar but much larger data set has great detailed statistics on DMCA removal trends, but his published conclusions do not include analysis of the validity of the claims processed.) [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 3:00 am
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 2:33 pm
Ouellette (@PatentScholar) April 5, 2019David Olson (@PIEBCLaw): How can patentees use licenses to price discriminate under current exhaustion law post-Impression v. [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 9:04 pm
The details follow:Cholewka v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 8:39 pm
State v. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm
The people who have enjoyed the free ride provided by the realization requirement are, however, unsurprisingly annoyed by the possibility that they might have to pay taxes like the little people do, so they are starting to complain.Even so, an excellent explainer in Tuesday’s New York Times ends with this: The problem may be in the Constitution, which gives Congress broad powers to impose taxes, but says “direct taxes”—a term without clear definition—should be… [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm
The people who have enjoyed the free ride provided by the realization requirement are, however, unsurprisingly annoyed by the possibility that they might have to pay taxes like the little people do, so they are starting to complain.Even so, an excellent explainer in Tuesday’s New York Times ends with this: The problem may be in the Constitution, which gives Congress broad powers to impose taxes, but says “direct taxes”—a term without clear definition—should be… [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:03 pm
[5] Commission Guidance Regarding Disclosure Related to Climate Change, Release No. 33-9106 (Feb. 2, 2010) [75 FR 6290 (Feb. 8, 2010)] [6] See Basic Inc. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 11:51 am
v=WgcrmuKK-iY&t. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 4:39 am
Menzel v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 10:55 am
The case citation is State v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 6:56 am
This iterative process continued in countries like India and China, each factory adding its own interpretation and modifications along the way.[17] Wiesner stated, “One thing we’re always so amazed by is the creativity that comes out of the half of the process when producing an object [in a factory]. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 12:00 am
Supreme Court in the affirmative action case of United Steelworkers of America v. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 2:31 pm
Chubin et al. at 10, Daubert v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 2:44 pm
Vermont National Telephone Company v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 3:13 pm
(snip)The industry’s pursuit of regulation on its own terms began in Maine in 2007.Sharon Anglin Treat, a lawyer and state legislator, had proposed a bill making clear that lawsuit lenders were subject to state consumer protection laws. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
Above all that, it was clearly wrongly decided, and illustrates how some judges have bad interpretive instincts when it comes to navigating the tricky but ultra-important voting rights realm.The case, Texas Democratic Party v. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 12:49 pm
Extra Expense Coverage pays for necessary additional expenses a business incurs that it would not have incurred if there had been no direct physical loss or damage to property at the described premises (or contingent premises if adequately endorsed) A good example of how distant businesses can be affected by catastrophes and yet recover under their own commercial policies is found in Archer Daniels Midland Co. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 1:25 pm
Newcomer and Daniel B. [read post]
