Search for: "People v. Short"
Results 4821 - 4840
of 8,137
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2018, 3:27 am
“The decision in Elk v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 7:02 am
* People v. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 8:51 pm
DeVries v. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 7:15 am
In South Dakota v. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 3:41 am
In short, the justices in 1898 felt more empathetic to the plight of white people being forced to ride a train car with blacks, while the justices 56 years later felt more empathetic to the plight of black people denied the right to use the same train cars, swimming pools, drinking fountains, and schools. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 3:30 am
It ruled in the case of Hively v. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 9:17 am
A case titled Escobedo v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:36 am
The appellate court in United States v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 4:00 am
National/Federal A Decision to Overturn Roe v. [read post]
31 May 2021, 9:02 am
A useful string cite is in the footnotes for lawyers wanting authority relevant to their particular case.(6) In the meantime, the Eleventh Circuit wrote a short but useful treatise on tester standing in Kennedy v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 4:40 am
In short: the lawyers don't care if they get the claims right at this point. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 10:59 pm
Immigration law matters The Free Movement blog posted a short commentary on one specific aspect in the case of NA (Iran) v Secretary of State for the Home Department : Section 55 of the Borders Act 2009 and enforcement measures concerning children. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 8:09 am
I figure the Kochs think that the management of Cato under Crane has long fallen short of professional standards, and that Crane’s continued leadership hurts Cato’s mission. [read post]
7 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm
Trump v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 5:57 am
It was not until two years later that a blanket ban on prisoners voting was introduced in the Representation of the People Act 1969. [read post]
4 Dec 2021, 3:14 pm
INS v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm
Bickel’s account – essentially, to emphasize the principles underlying the 14th Amendment and its capacity for growth, rather than how people at the time understood it – is of a piece with one of the ways originalists try to save their approach from generating unacceptable conclusions. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 3:17 pm
’” (Citing Laurel Heights Improvement Assn. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 6:57 am
However, to make a long story short, under the Rehnquist and now the Roberts courts, things have improved. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:30 am
The Independent has a short report here and the Hansard transcript is here. [read post]
