Search for: "Smith, Appeal of" Results 4821 - 4840 of 10,316
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2012, 12:02 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
In October, a burly, curly-haired activist calling himself Antonin Smith moved into St. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 4:10 am by John Day
The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals has affirmed the dismissal of a case against Wal-Mart for selling bullets to a person without requiring her to present an identification card as required by Illinois law. [read post]
18 Sep 2012, 9:12 am by D. Kappos
I thought I'd write to observe the occasion of the first submissions to our new Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) through their new IT system called Patent Review Processing System (PRPS). [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 10:05 am by admin
This past week the United States Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit found that Proposition 8, which banned same-sex marriage in California, violated the Equal Protection rights of the two same-sex couples who brought the suit. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 3:28 am
Lacey Smith, No. 96,189 (Cowley)State appeal (petition for review)Larry SchwartzWhether passenger was seized when driver detained for traffic offenseOctober 25-Thursday-p.m.State v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 1:31 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
Charles Smith, No. 99,655 (Douglas)Direct appeal (petition for review); RobberyMeryl Carver-AllmondImproper denial of appointed counsel's motion to withdrawImproper cop testimony in re ID of person on videoState v. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
Smith:   Smith had lost his first appeal, then in Son of State v. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 11:00 pm
With the terse formality that is common to statements by Singapore's criminal justice authorities, it noted:The appeals of both Tochi and Malachy to the Court of Appeal and to the President for clemency have been turned down. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 5:00 pm
Smith, No. 149 In a sex-offender registration proceeding following defendant's guilty plea to a rape charge, order classifying defendant as a level two sex offender is reversed where the lower court did not adequately set forth the findings of fact and conclusions of law on which it based its decision to assess defendant 20 points under the risk factor pertaining to defendant's relationship with the victim. [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
In a post published before the decision, Graham Smith writes about “Red lines and no-go zones – the coming surveillance debate”. [read post]