Search for: "United States v. AT&T, Inc."
Results 4821 - 4840
of 8,841
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2014, 1:51 pm
” Records on file with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) show that on August 5, 2013, Tesla Motors, Inc. filed a trademark application for “Model E,” in several classes of goods, including that for “Automobiles and structural parts therefor. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 9:30 am
In Juniper Networks, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 6:38 am
T. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 11:54 am
” Apple Inc. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm
Hoosier Energy Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 6:19 am
’ L'Oreal USA, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 10:03 am
Texaco Inc.? [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 7:33 pm
Honeywell Int’l Inc., No. 2012-1660 (Fed. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 9:24 am
Medtronic, Inc., No. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 10:37 am
Court, WD Texas 2013 United States District Court, W.D. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 10:11 pm
Procedural History[In an inter partes reexamination,] t]he United States Patent and Trademark Office’s (PTO) Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Board) reversed the examiner’s rejection of claims 1–3 and 6–13 of U.S. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 3:35 pm
In 2004, after several years of lobbying, agents of the litigation industry managed to push a policy statement past the Association’s leadership, to condemn the requirement of evidence-based reasoning in federal courts in the United States. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 3:06 am
Indeed, the very definition of Promote states that it is “determined under Sections 6.1 (a)(iii)-(v). [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 2:27 pm
More recently, in Fenty v Arcadia Group Brands Ltd (t/a Topshop) [2013] EWHC 2310 (noted by the IPKat here), pop star Rihanna succeeded in her claim for passing off against retail giant Topshop, who used her image on a t-shirt without her permission. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 7:40 am
Apple, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 7:26 am
Finding that the pilots’ complaints raised only “minor disputes” that were subject to mandatory arbitration under the Railway Labor Act, the court granted the defendants’ motions to dismiss (Cunningham v United Airlines, Inc., February 4, 2014, Holderman, J). [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 10:16 am
Similarly, United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 6:19 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 8:23 am
United States Steel Corp., Case No. 12-417 (Jan. 27, 2014), addressing donning and doffing claims in the context of a unionized steel mill. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 12:05 pm
In State v. [read post]
