Search for: "Wells v. Wells"
Results 4821 - 4840
of 96,982
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2011, 12:01 pm
By Jason Rantanen Boston Scientific Corp. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 12:11 pm
MySpace, but the results are no different; and this case gets quickly tossed per 230 as well. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 5:55 am
Beaty and Republic of Iraq v. [read post]
2 May 2019, 3:10 pm
Heather’s Legal Summaries: R v Trinchi, 2019 ONCA 356 R v Trinchi is the most recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision in a string of cases related to the offence of voyeurism under s. 162(1) of the Criminal Code (see our previous post on the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in R v Jarvis). [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 8:08 am
(Note to plaintiffs: if you’re going to have back and forth with a platform, you may as well send a DMCA takedown request.) [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 9:16 am
That was the issue considered by The Intellectual Property Office of Singapore's (IPOS) in the opposition matter of U-Manga International Business Co., Ltd v nunufish.com . [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 8:00 pm
Chang v. [read post]
6 Jun 2015, 8:59 pm
The case is captioned Bass v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 5:40 am
Most people as well as a lot of lawyers stop their legal malpractice analysis at the first element: departure from good practice. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 3:45 am
He came up with a well-presented, nuanced argument that the court should use Judge Whiteside’s concurring opinion in the 1982 case of State v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 1:46 pm
Particularly if both parents are working far from home, it might well be that the parents take the kids with them and place them locally. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 9:13 pm
The German Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) recently had to decide on the legality of a trade mark parody that 'in its overall impression' was based on an earlier well-known trade mark; (decision of 2 April 2015 - I ZR 59/13 - Springender Pudel).The oriignalThe claimant was the leading sports article manufacturer Puma, who owns the well-known German word-device trade mark for the word element "PUMA" combined with the outline of a jumping puma. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 1:38 pm
Ameriprise and in Jones v. [read post]
18 Dec 2010, 10:31 am
My partner Keith Sabey had the privilege of representing Virginia Derksen, one of the successful parties in the case of Werbenuk v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 11:40 am
This moggy has been kept busy over the last 24 hours with matters of partiality at the EPO, Swiss form claims, and Bolar exemption in UK and under unitary patent, and then, no sooner was he thinking of emerging from the deluge, fellow Kat Annsley kindly drew his attention to the eagerly awaited substantive decision in the case of Actavis v Lilly (as we shall call it for short - you may wish to call it Actavis UK Ltd & Ors v Eli Lilly & Company [2014] EWHC 1511 (Pat) (15 May… [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 2:43 pm
I'm late to reporting about the, well, maybe vendetta is the right word, for the on-going dispute between lawyer Jack Thompson and video game publisher Take Two, which distributes Grand Theft Auto. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 7:14 pm
LESSIG: Well, Mr. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 7:48 am
State v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:07 am
Minsky v. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 1:10 pm
MCKINNEY V. [read post]
