Search for: "C. v. C." Results 4841 - 4860 of 56,564
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
SCOTUS: Quon decided; City’s access of employee’s text messages was reasonable under O’Connor v. Ortega
17 Jun 2010, 8:56 am
Skinner v. [read post]
FourthAmendment.com - http://fourthamendment.com/blog/index.php?blog=1
N.D.Ga.: Merely blocking a car doesn't per se constitute a seizure
24 May 2012, 12:03 pm
Under Miller v. [read post]
FourthAmendment.com - http://fourthamendment.com/blog/index.php?blog=1
How did Scalia's anti-federalism bluster in City of Arlington v. FCC go unnoticed by six justices?
24 May 2013, 8:35 am by Rick Hills
At least since Altria v. [read post]
PrawfsBlawg - http://prawfsblawg.blogs.com/prawfsblawg/
The Marine Liability Act and the “Polluter Pay” Regime: A Review of the Court’s Decision in British Columbia v. The Administrator of the Ship-source Oil Pollution Fund, 2019 BCCA 232
27 Aug 2019, 6:55 am by Chantal DeSereville
In TSSA v. [read post]
Environmental Law Blog - https://www.siskinds.com/category/environmental-law/
The swallows and the crystal ball
8 Jan 2008, 8:39 am
C. [read post]
SW Virginia law blog - http://swvalaw.blogspot.com/
Warning!!! Pre-Trial Motions for Severence Must Be Renewed at Close of Evidence or They Are Waived on Appeal
10 Jan 2011, 12:59 pm by mjpetro
Plato and Bishop C. [read post]
7th Circuit Criminal Law Alert - http://mjpetro.typepad.com/7th_circuit_alert/
"Schools are under a duty to adequately supervise the students in their charge and they will be held liable for foreseeable injuries proximately related to the absence of adequate supervision" (Mirand v City of New York, 84 NY2d 44, 49; see D.M. v Yonkers City Sch. Dist., 220 AD3d 672). "Schools are not insurers of safety, however, for they cannot reasonably be expected to continuously supervise and control all movements and activities of students" (Mirand v City of New York, 84 NY2d at 49; see R.B. v Sewanhaka Cent. High Sch. Dist., 207 AD3d 607, 609).
17 Jun 2024, 11:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Decided on June 12, 2024 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial DepartmentMARK C. [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
"Schools are under a duty to adequately supervise the students in their charge and they will be held liable for foreseeable injuries proximately related to the absence of adequate supervision" (Mirand v City of New York, 84 NY2d 44, 49; see D.M. v Yonkers City Sch. Dist., 220 AD3d 672). "Schools are not insurers of safety, however, for they cannot reasonably be expected to continuously supervise and control all movements and activities of students" (Mirand v City of New York, 84 NY2d at 49; see R.B. v Sewanhaka Cent. High Sch. Dist., 207 AD3d 607, 609).
17 Jun 2024, 11:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Decided on June 12, 2024 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial DepartmentMARK C. [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
Missouri v. McNeely - Post-Decision
13 Aug 2013, 2:02 pm by Federalist Society
On April 17, 2013, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Missouri v. [read post]
Federalist Society SCOTUScast - http://fedsoc.server326.com/audio/SCOTUScast/SCOTUScast.xml
The Charney v. S&C Settlement: Distorted Perceptions of Employment Discrimination Lawsuits
26 Oct 2007, 10:36 am
  And S&C certainly is keeping this under wraps, so if a leak happens, suspicion would center on Charney, and I'm sure the terms of the settlement give S&C the right to claw back the whole settlement amount if Charney leaks. [read post]
PrawfsBlawg - http://prawfsblawg.blogs.com/prawfsblawg/
Green Bag’s new Spring 2013 issue
4 Jun 2013, 7:43 am by Ross Davies
Bainbridge Democracy v. [read post]
PrawfsBlawg - http://prawfsblawg.blogs.com/prawfsblawg/
"UCL Standing to Seek Injunctive Relief: Is a Restitutionary Loss Required?"
18 Aug 2008, 1:00 pm
Feb. 12, 2007) and G&C Auto Body Inc. v. [read post]
The UCL Practitioner - http://www.uclpractitioner.com/
False Patent Marking Requires Particular Allegations That Each Defendant Marked
15 Aug 2011, 4:07 am by R. David Donoghue
Nestle USA, Inc., No. 09 C 4792, Slip Op. [read post]
Chicago IP Litigation Blog - http://www.chicagoiplitigation.com/
Injured Fisherman Medevaced from F/V Patricia Lee
26 Oct 2021, 3:57 pm by Joseph Stacey
The F/V PATRICIA LEE was located about 225 miles west of Dutch Harbor at the time of the accident. [read post]
Maritime Injury Law Blog - http://www.maritimeinjurylawyersblog.com/
Cómo detectar el fraude en la industria de la salud
27 Apr 2021, 1:12 pm by Herrman & Herrman, P.L.L.C.
Por esta razón, es importante aprender tanto como sea posible sobre el fraude en la atención médica y saber cómo identificar los signos de este fraude. [read post]
Herrman & Herrman, P.L.L.C. Blog - https://www.herrmanandherrman.com/blog/
To be Exempt from Landmark Designation, a Property Must be Related to the Owner's Religious Mission Before Application for the Exemption
2 Feb 2011, 10:15 am by Abbott & Kindermann
By Glen Hansen In Hashalom v. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
SJC Reverses Defendant’s Admission to Sufficient Facts Due to Insufficient Immigration Warnings During Plea Colloquy
15 Jun 2020, 10:54 am by Daniel Cappetta
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
Massachusetts Criminal Lawyer Blog - http://www.massachusettscriminallawyer-blog.com/
SJC Rules that Public Defenders, Not Judges, Have Independent Authority to Appoint Attorneys to Cases
18 Jul 2017, 6:54 am by Daniel Cappetta
In the decision – Deputy Chief Counsel for the Public Defender Division of CPCS v. [read post]
Massachusetts Criminal Lawyer Blog - http://www.massachusettscriminallawyer-blog.com/
A Local Ordinance Protecting Views Is A Zoning Ordinance For The Purpose Of Govt. Code Section 65009 90-day Statute Of Limitations, Even When The Ordinance Is Not Adopted As Part Of City Code’s Zoning Title
16 Sep 2019, 9:47 pm by William W. Abbott
Shirli Fabbri Weiss v. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
Idenix v. Gilead: $2.5 Billion for Patent Infringement
15 Dec 2016, 3:08 pm by Dennis Crouch
Merck’s sub Idenix was just awarded $2.54 billion for Gilead’s infringement of its Hep-C treatment patents. [read post]
Patently-O - http://patentlyo.com/patent