Search for: "JONES v. THE STATE"
Results 4841 - 4860
of 6,262
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2009, 2:58 pm
Presumably, my adoption of the hybrid approach is subject to a deferential standard of review, even by those more classically inclined.United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 6:35 am
Case Name: K.H. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 12:35 pm
Jones, have expressed at least some capacity to understand aspects of the technology (though likely not as much as some have said). [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 12:35 pm
Jones, have expressed at least some capacity to understand aspects of the technology (though likely not as much as some have said). [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 6:22 am
Medtronic v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 1:47 pm
In a 2008 case, Jones v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm
., at or in the direction of another, whether or not the actor believes it to be loaded; or (5) Commits a simple assault as defined in subsection a. (1), (2) or (3) of this section upon: (a) Any law enforcement officer acting in the performance of his duties while in uniform or exhibiting evidence of his authority or because of his status as a law enforcement officer; or (b) Any paid or volunteer fireman acting in the performance of his duties while in uniform or otherwise clearly identifiable as… [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 2:01 pm
Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit reversed in relevant part, rejecting the states’ nondelegation challenge; the court also concluded other claims were time-barred because the states acted more than a decade after CMS promulgated the rule. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 5:00 pm
The Third Circuit agreed with the Supreme Court’s holding in Jones v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 12:16 pm
Kohli v. [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 7:30 am
" Holcomb v. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 3:35 pm
* An amended Capitol v MP3Tunes opinion explains why 17 USC 512 applies to state copyright claims (see pages 14-17). [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 10:07 am
BrownDocket: 10-224Issue(s): (1) Did the Ninth Circuit err in holding that a “presumption against preemption” requires a “narrow interpretation” of the Federal Meat Inspection Act's express preemption provision, in conflict with this Court's decision in Jones v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 8:33 am
Maryland, 442 U.S. 735 (1979) and United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 7:02 am
ACSBlog notes the fortieth anniversary this month of Goldberg v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 2:00 am
June 24th - Global-Tech v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 2:00 am
June 24th - Global-Tech v. [read post]
16 May 2022, 10:59 am
” The justices also granted review in Jones v. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 3:05 pm
[1] See Jones v. [read post]
