Search for: "United States v. May" Results 4841 - 4860 of 47,659
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2011, 11:52 am by Michael Dimino
  Because the United States government prosecuted Mr. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 9:17 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Not everyone in the United States may be familiar with the extent of the brands held by Bimbo Bakeries USA. [read post]
8 May 2015, 1:23 pm by Native American Rights Fund
Lavallie (Indian Child Welfare Act - Concurrent Jurisdiction) * United States Federal Trial Courts Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/dct/2015dct.htmlJamul Action Committee v. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 12:25 pm
 The United States may be headed by the former head of a reality show. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:30 am by Jeremy Tyler
While the standards for expert witness testimony may differ between state and federal courts, all federal courts are bound by Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and the United States Supreme Court’s decisions in Daubert v. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 4:45 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
An exception exists and liability may be extended where a plaintiff sufficiently pleads acts of fraud, collusion, malicious acts or other special circumstances (see Leggiadro, Ltd. v Winston & Strawn, 119 AD3d 442 [Pt Dept 2014]). [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 7:30 am by Beth Graham
Tomorrow, the United States Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in American Express Corp. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 7:30 am by Beth Graham
Tomorrow, the United States Supreme Court will hear oral argument in American Express Corp. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 5:09 pm
In April, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in San Francisco, ordered prosecutors in Alaska to turn over DNA evidence that had been used to convict William G. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 10:05 am by Big Tent Democrat
While it repeats the litany of arguments seen previously (and ignores the import of the Necessary and Proper Clause I discussed in this post), it places a great deal of emphasis on the supposed invasion of federal power on state police power: Can the United States Congress employ an enhanced Commerce Clause authority to mandate expectant mothers undergo amniocentesis testing in order to identify and treat individuals, yet unborn, whose extraordinary medical expenses… [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 6:30 am by Amanda Rice
United States, in which the Court held that the “honest services” fraud statute covers only bribery and kickback schemes, lost the appeal of his conviction in the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 5:48 am
A three-judge panel of the Indiana Court of Appeals unanimously struck down a state voter ID law previously upheld by the United States Supreme Court in Crawford v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 5:00 am by zshapiro
As I have pointed out the Federal Courts may deny a writ of habeas corpus in a state court case even if the state court is wrong as long as the state court reasonably interpreted a United States Supreme Court decision. [read post]